1. - Heard.

2. Despite specific directions case-diary was not produced. Hence heard the learned counsel for the parties on the material placed before me.

3. On 22.3.99 Rajnish Pandey-complainant, filed a complaint in the court of Judicial Magistrate, alleging therein that he was an employee of Ashish Goyal who was one of the Directors of M/s. Goyal Fashion Ltd.

4. Shri Ashish had authorised him to sell his shares through a reliable share brokers; that on coming in contract with the present applicant Ashutosh Purohit the complainant entered into business transaction with Smt. Krishna Pareek and Shri Arvind Tiwari, who were dealing in the shares; that in the transactions carried on between the parties upto March 1995 a sum of Rs. 3,18,302.30 remained outstanding against the aforesaid dealer which they did not pay despite repeated demands from the complainant. The complaint was forwarded under section 156(3) Criminal Procedure Code to the Police Station Sadar, Jaipur, thereupon Crime No. 87/99 under Section 409 and 120-B Indian Penal Code was registered against the applicant and Smt. Krishna Pareek and Arvind Tiwari. Apprehending his arrest in that case the applicant unsuccessfu