SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Raj) 1327

ARUN MADAN
Jamnalal – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - Since common questions of fact and law are involved in both these writ petitions, they have been heard finally and decided by this common order.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner at length and given thoughtful consideration to the material available on record.

3. Admittedly, the petitioner was already in possession of the land in question much prior to the introduction of the Rajasthan Land Reforms and Resumption of Jagirs Act, 1952 (for short the Act of 1952) came into force i.e. Samwat 2009 (1952). Sub-Section (1) of Section 22 of the Act of 1952, which stipulates the consequences of resumption are as under:

(1) As from the date of resumption of any jagir lands notwithstanding anything contained in any existing jagir law applicable thereto but save as otherwise provided in this Act,

(a) all rights, title and interest of the Jagirdar and of every other person claiming through him (X X X X) in his jagir lands, including forest, trees, fisheries, wells, tanks, ponds, water channels, ferries, pathways, village sites, hats, bazars and mela grounds and mines and minerals whether being worked or not, shall stand resumed to the Government free from all encumbrance






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top