RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
N.C.Kochi Kochhar, M.B.Sharma, JJ.
Virendra Dangi - Appellant
Versus
Union of India & ors. - Respondent
D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.787 of 1991.
Decided On : 9-03-1992
The court analyzed the provisions of the State Reorganisation Act, 1956, the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949, and the Constitution of India. The State Reorganisation Act, 1956 provided for the establishment of a High Court for the new State of Rajasthan, and the President issued an order under Section 51(2) of the Act to establish a permanent bench at Jaipur. The Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949 conferred powers on the Chief Justice for the distribution and conduct of the business of the High Court. The Constitution of India, specifically Article 226, grants the High Court jurisdiction to issue writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, certiorari, etc. The court also referred to the case law of Ram Rakh Vyas v. Union of India, 1977 RLW 65, State of Maharashtra v. Narayan Shamrao Puranik and others, AIR 1983 SC 46, and Suraj Mal v. State, AIR 1954 Rajasthan 303, to interpret and apply the relevant legal provisions.
Fact of the Case:
The judgment deals with a challenge to the order dated December 23, 1976, passed by the Hon'ble Chief Justice, which established a permanent bench at Jaipur under the High Court of Rajasthan (Establishment of a Permanent Bench at Jaipur) Order, 1976. The petitioner argued that the order was invalid on various grounds, including lack of prior consultation with the Chief Justice and the President's lack of power to curtail the jurisdiction of the principal seat of the High Court at Jodhpur. The court held that the Presidential Order was valid and that the permanent bench at Jaipur had exclusive jurisdiction over cases arising in the specified districts. The court also struck down the Explanation to the order issued by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice, as it was beyond his powers and contrary to the Presidential Order and Article 226 of the Constitution.
Finding of the Court:
The court analyzed the provisions of the State Reorganisation Act, 1956, the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949, and the Constitution of India. It referred to the case of Ram Rakh Vyas v. Union of India, 1977 RLW 65, where the validity of the Presidential Order was upheld. The court also considered the case of State of Maharashtra v. Narayan Shamrao Puranik and others, AIR 1983 SC 46, which discussed the powers of the President under Section 51 of the Act. The court concluded that the Presidential Order conferred exclusive jurisdiction on the permanent bench at Jaipur and that the Explanation issued by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice was beyond his powers.
Ratio Decidendi: The main legal point established in this judgment is that the Presidential Order establishing a permanent bench at Jaipur was valid and conferred exclusive jurisdiction on the bench over cases arising in the specified districts. The court also held that the Explanation issued by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice, defining when a writ case shall be deemed to arise, was beyond his powers and contrary to the Presidential Order and Article 226 of the Constitution.
Result: The court allowed the writ petition, striking down the Explanation issued by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice. The court held that the permanent bench at Jaipur had exclusive jurisdiction over cases arising in the specified districts, and the principal seat of the High Court at Jodhpur had no jurisdiction in those cases, unless specifically ordered by the Chief Justice. The court also emphasized that the jurisdiction of the court will be decided by the court itself when the occasion arises.
"In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 51 of the State Reorganisation Act, 1956 (37 of 1956), the President, after consultation with the Governor of Rajasthan and the Chief Justice of the High Court of Rajasthan, is pleased to make the following Order, namely:
1. Short title and commencement - (1) This Order may be called the High Court of Rajasthan (Establishment of a Permanent Bench at Jaipur) Order, 1976.
(2) It shall come into force on the 31st day of January, 1977.
2. Establishment of a Permanent Bench of the Rajasthan High Court at Jaipur - There shall be established a permanent Bench of the High Court of Rajasthan at Jaipur, and such Judges of the High Court of Rajasthan, being not less than five in number, as the Chief Justice of that High Court may, from time to time nominate, shall sit at Jaipur in order to exercise the jurisdiction and power for the time being vested in that High Court in respect of cases arising in the districts of Ajmer, Alwar, Bharatpur, Bundi, Jaipur, Jhalawar, Jhunjhunu, Kotah, Sawaimadhopur, Sikar and Tonk:
Provided that the Chief Justice of that I ugh Court may, in his discretion, order that any case or class of cases arising in any such district shall be heard at Jodhpur.
Sd/- F.A. Ahmed
President "After the aforesaid Presidential Order was issued the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice, as said earlier, issued an order dated December 23,1976 which reads as under:
"RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT JODHPUR
NOTIFICATION
No.1 /J-D
Dated. December 23,1976
In pursuance of the High Court of Rajasthan (Establishment of a Permanent Bench at Jaipur) Order,1976 and in exercise of the powers under sub-section(2) of Section 44 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949 read with Section 54 and 57 of the State Reorganisation Act, 1956, the Hon'ble the Chief Justice has been pleased to order that with effect from the 31st day of January, 1977-
(a) all cases arising in the revenue districts of Banswara, Barmer, Bikaner, Bhilwara, Chitt
Nasiruddin v. State Transport Appellate Tribunal AIR 1976 SC 331
State of Maharashtra v. Narayan Shamrao Puranik and others AIR 1983 SC 46
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.