SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Raj) 585

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
N.C.Kochi Kochhar, M.B.Sharma, JJ.
Virendra Dangi - Appellant
Versus
Union of India & ors. - Respondent
D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.787 of 1991.
Decided On : 9-03-1992

The main legal point established in this judgment is that the Presidential Order establishing a permanent bench at Jaipur was valid and conferred exclusive jurisdiction on the bench over cases arising in the specified districts. The court also held that the Explanation issued by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice, defining when a writ case shall be deemed to arise, was beyond his powers and contrary to the Presidential Order and Article 226 of the Constitution.

Headnote:

The court analyzed the provisions of the State Reorganisation Act, 1956, the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949, and the Constitution of India. The State Reorganisation Act, 1956 provided for the establishment of a High Court for the new State of Rajasthan, and the President issued an order under Section 51(2) of the Act to establish a permanent bench at Jaipur. The Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949 conferred powers on the Chief Justice for the distribution and conduct of the business of the High Court. The Constitution of India, specifically Article 226, grants the High Court jurisdiction to issue writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, certiorari, etc. The court also referred to the case law of Ram Rakh Vyas v. Union of India, 1977 RLW 65, State of Maharashtra v. Narayan Shamrao Puranik and others, AIR 1983 SC 46, and Suraj Mal v. State, AIR 1954 Rajasthan 303, to interpret and apply the relevant legal provisions.

Fact of the Case:

The judgment deals with a challenge to the order dated December 23, 1976, passed by the Hon'ble Chief Justice, which established a permanent bench at Jaipur under the High Court of Rajasthan (Establishment of a Permanent Bench at Jaipur) Order, 1976. The petitioner argued that the order was invalid on various grounds, including lack of prior consultation with the Chief Justice and the President's lack of power to curtail the jurisdiction of the principal seat of the High Court at Jodhpur. The court held that the Presidential Order was valid and that the permanent bench at Jaipur had exclusive jurisdiction over cases arising in the specified districts. The court also struck down the Explanation to the order issued by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice, as it was beyond his powers and contrary to the Presidential Order and Article 226 of the Constitution.

Finding of the Court:

The court analyzed the provisions of the State Reorganisation Act, 1956, the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949, and the Constitution of India. It referred to the case of Ram Rakh Vyas v. Union of India, 1977 RLW 65, where the validity of the Presidential Order was upheld. The court also considered the case of State of Maharashtra v. Narayan Shamrao Puranik and others, AIR 1983 SC 46, which discussed the powers of the President under Section 51 of the Act. The court concluded that the Presidential Order conferred exclusive jurisdiction on the permanent bench at Jaipur and that the Explanation issued by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice was beyond his powers.

Ratio Decidendi: The main legal point established in this judgment is that the Presidential Order establishing a permanent bench at Jaipur was valid and conferred exclusive jurisdiction on the bench over cases arising in the specified districts. The court also held that the Explanation issued by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice, defining when a writ case shall be deemed to arise, was beyond his powers and contrary to the Presidential Order and Article 226 of the Constitution.

Result: The court allowed the writ petition, striking down the Explanation issued by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice. The court held that the permanent bench at Jaipur had exclusive jurisdiction over cases arising in the specified districts, and the principal seat of the High Court at Jodhpur had no jurisdiction in those cases, unless specifically ordered by the Chief Justice. The court also emphasized that the jurisdiction of the court will be decided by the court itself when the occasion arises.

JUDGMENT

1. - There is yet another challenge to the order dated December 23, 1976, passed by Hon'ble Chief Justice, which order was issued under the High Court of Rajasthan (Establishment of a Permanent Bench at Jaipur) Order, 1976 (for short, the Presidential Order). Before we take up the order of the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice, we may state briefly the position after inauguration of the Constitution on January 26, 1950. After the inauguration of the Constitution on January 26, 1950, the old State of Rajasthan became a Part 'B' State. The new State of Rajasthan comprising of the territories mentioned in Section 10 of the State Reorganisation Act, 1956 (for short, the Act) was constituted on November 1, 1956, i.e., from the appointed date. Section 49 (2) of the Act contained a provision that from the appointed date, there shall be established a High Court for the new State of Rajasthan. As provided in Section 50(1) of the Act the existing High Court in the State of Rajasthan which till then was part B" State, ceased to function and 'stood abolished. The President issued an order on October 27, 1956 under sub-section(1) of Section 50, under which it was directed that the principal seat of the High Court for the new State of Rajasthan shall be at Jodhpur. The Chief Justice in exercise of his powers under Section 51(3) established a temporary Bench at Jaipur w.e.f. November 1, 1956. Subsequently, the said temporary Bench of the High Court at Jaipur was abolished by the Hon'ble Chief Justice under his order dated July 14, 1958. Since then the question of a permanent Bench of the High Court as under consideration of the Central Government. Eventually, the President in exercise of his powers conferred by sub-section(2) of Section 51 of the Act and after consultation with the Governor of Rajasthan and Chief Justice of the High Court of Rajasthan issued the Presidential Order which had come into force on January 31, 1977. The Presidential Order may now be read which reads as under:

"In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 51 of the State Reorganisation Act, 1956 (37 of 1956), the President, after consultation with the Governor of Rajasthan and the Chief Justice of the High Court of Rajasthan, is pleased to make the following Order, namely:

1. Short title and commencement - (1) This Order may be called the High Court of Rajasthan (Establishment of a Permanent Bench at Jaipur) Order, 1976.

(2) It shall come into force on the 31st day of January, 1977.

2. Establishment of a Permanent Bench of the Rajasthan High Court at Jaipur - There shall be established a permanent Bench of the High Court of Rajasthan at Jaipur, and such Judges of the High Court of Rajasthan, being not less than five in number, as the Chief Justice of that High Court may, from time to time nominate, shall sit at Jaipur in order to exercise the jurisdiction and power for the time being vested in that High Court in respect of cases arising in the districts of Ajmer, Alwar, Bharatpur, Bundi, Jaipur, Jhalawar, Jhunjhunu, Kotah, Sawaimadhopur, Sikar and Tonk:

Provided that the Chief Justice of that I ugh Court may, in his discretion, order that any case or class of cases arising in any such district shall be heard at Jodhpur.
Sd/- F.A. Ahmed

President "After the aforesaid Presidential Order was issued the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice, as said earlier, issued an order dated December 23,1976 which reads as under:

"RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT JODHPUR

NOTIFICATION

No.1 /J-D
Dated. December 23,1976

In pursuance of the High Court of Rajasthan (Establishment of a Permanent Bench at Jaipur) Order,1976 and in exercise of the powers under sub-section(2) of Section 44 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949 read with Section 54 and 57 of the State Reorganisation Act, 1956, the Hon'ble the Chief Justice has been pleased to order that with effect from the 31st day of January, 1977-

(a) all cases arising in the revenue districts of Banswara, Barmer, Bikaner, Bhilwara, Chitt




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top