SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Raj) 991

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
M.R.Calla, J.
Deepu @ Devendra Singh - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
S.B. Cri. Misc. Bail Application No. 5152 of 1992.
Decided On : 4-12-1992

Advocates:
For the Petitioner:S.K. Tiwari, Advocate.
For the State: Mr. M. Kaushik, Addl. P.P.

The court's decision to grant bail under Section 439, Cr.P.C. was based on the recovery of opium poppy husk, the absence of pending cases under the Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act against the petitioner, and the petitioner's undertaking not to repeat the offence in the future.

Headnote:

Bail - Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act - The court granted bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439, Cr.P.C. based on the recovery of 18 Kg. opium poppy husk, the absence of any pending cases under the Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act against the petitioner, and the petitioner's undertaking not to repeat the offence in the future.

Fact of the Case:

The accused petitioner had been in jail since 5.11.1992, and 18 Kg. opium poppy husk was recovered from him. The petitioner disclosed his previous engagement in such activities, but no criminal case under the Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act was registered against him, nor any other case under the Act was pending against him.

Finding of the Court:

The court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, granted bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439, Cr.P.C. based on the facts and circumstances of the case.

Issues: The main issue was whether the accused petitioner should be granted bail under Section 439, Cr.P.C. considering the recovery of opium poppy husk and the absence of pending cases under the Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act against the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the recovery of 18 Kg. opium poppy husk, the absence of pending cases under the Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act against the petitioner, and the petitioner's undertaking not to repeat the offence in the future.

Final Decision: Bail was granted to the accused-petitioner Deepu alias Devendra Singh upon furnishing a personal bond and sureties to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

JUDGMENT

1. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor and perused the documents on record. Dr. S.K. Tiwari has argued that the present accused petitioner is in jail since 5.11.1992. It is also alleged that 18 Kg. opium poppy husk was recovered from the petitioner. He has cited Zakir Hussain v. State, 1989 Cr.L.R. (Raj.) 771 , in which 6 quintals poppy husk had been recovered and the bail was granted. In this order, an earlier bail order in Sardar Singh & ors. v. State of Rajasthan, S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 689/1986 , has also been referred in which 5662 kgs. of opium poppy husk was recovered and bail was granted. Mr. M. Kaushik has pointed out that during the course of investigation the petitioner has divulged that he has been engaged in such activities earlier, although no criminal case under the Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act was registered against him, nor any other case under Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act is pending against the petitioner. The petitioner also undertakes not to repeat the offence in future. In the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am inclined to accept this bail application under Section 439, Cr.P.C. to the accused petitioner.

2. It is, therefore, ordered that the accused-petitioner Deepu alias Devendra Singh be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of Rs. 5000/- (Rupees five thousand) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court to appear before it as and when called upon to do so during the pendency of the trial against him.Bail granted.

*******


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top