SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Raj) 1040

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
A.S.Godara, J.
Dhanna Ram And Ors. - Appellant
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Jail Appeal No. 215 of 1995.
Decided On : 16-05-1996

Advocates:
For the Appellant: B.L. Khatri, Amicus Curiae.
For the State: D.S. Rathore, Public Prosecutor.

The court interpreted Sections 304B, 306, 498A, 113A and 113B of the Indian Penal Code and the Indian Evidence Act to hold that the appellants were guilty of abetment of suicide under Section 306 Indian Penal Code and not under Section 304B Indian Penal Code.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL APPEAL - CONVICTION FOR OFFENCES UNDER SECTIONS 304B/34 AND 498A/34, INDIAN PENAL CODE - CHALLENGE - FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE - EVIDENCE ON RECORD - INTERPRETATION OF SECTIONS 304B, 306, 498A, 113A AND 113B OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE AND THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT - HELD, APPELLANTS WERE GUILTY OF OFFENCE UNDER SECTION 306 IPC AND NOT UNDER SECTION 304B IPC - CONVICTION UNDER SECTION 498A IPC UPHELD - SENTENCE MODIFIED.

Fact of the Case:

The appellants were convicted under Sections 304B/34 and 498A/34, Indian Penal Code for the death of Smt. Chooni, wife of appellant Kheraj Ram. The prosecution alleged that the appellants and their family members subjected Smt. Chooni to cruelty and harassment for dowry, which led to her suicide. The appellants denied the allegations and claimed that Smt. Chooni was mentally unstable and committed suicide.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that there was no evidence to support the prosecution's case that the appellants had demanded dowry or subjected Smt. Chooni to cruelty or harassment. The court also found that Smt. Chooni was not mentally unstable and that she had committed suicide due to the mental stress and trauma she was undergoing as a result of the appellants' conduct. The court held that the appellants were guilty of abetment of suicide under Section 306 Indian Penal Code and upheld their conviction under Section 498A Indian Penal Code.

Issues: 1. Whether the appellants were guilty of offence under Section 304B/34, Indian Penal Code? 2. Whether the appellants were guilty of offence under Section 306 Indian Penal Code? 3. Whether the appellants were guilty of offence under Section 498A/34, Indian Penal Code?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. Section 304B Indian Penal Code requires that the death of the victim should have been caused otherwise than under normal circumstances, within 7 years of marriage, and that the victim must have been subjected to cruelty or harassment by the accused for or in connection with demand of dowry. 2. In the present case, there was no evidence to support the prosecution's case that the appellants had demanded dowry or subjected Smt. Chooni to cruelty or harassment. Therefore, the appellants could not be convicted under Section 304B Indian Penal Code. 3. Section 306 Indian Penal Code requires that the accused must have abetted the act of commission of suicide by the victim. In the present case, the court found that the appellants' conduct had created a suffocating tense and perturbing atmosphere amounting to cruelty, which led Smt. Chooni to commit suicide. Therefore, the appellants were guilty of abetment of suicide under Section 306 Indian Penal Code. 4. Section 498A Indian Penal Code defines cruelty as any wilful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health whether mental or physical of the woman, or harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand. 5. In the present case, the court found that the appellants' conduct amounted to cruelty as defined under Section 498A Indian Penal Code. Therefore, the appellants were guilty of offence under Section 498A Indian Penal Code.

Final Decision: The appeal was partly allowed. The appellants were acquitted of the offence under Section 304B/34, Indian Penal Code and convicted under Section 306 Indian Penal Code. Their conviction under Section 498A/34, Indian Penal Code was upheld. The appellants were sentenced to 3 years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 5000/- each under Section 306 Indian Penal Code. In default of payment of fine, they were to undergo 6 months' rigorous imprisonment.

JUDGMENT

1. - This jail appeal has been filed by the appellants-accused Dhanna Ram and Kheraj Ram through the jail against the judgment dated 29.4.1995 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Barmer in Sessions Case No. 41/93 whereby each of them has been convicted under Sections 304B/34 and 498A/34, Indian Penal Code and a sentence of 10 years' S.I. and a fine of Rs. 200/- and, in default of payment of fine, one month's S.I. as well as sentence of 2 years' S.I. and a fine of Rs. 100/- and, in default of payment of fine, S.I. of 15 days, respectively was awarded to each accused.

2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case is as follows: P.W. lGhansi Ram Tehsildar, Chohtan District Banner forwarded Ex.P. 1 report along with Ex.P. 6 post-mortem report, P.W. 7 report of medical officer, Ex.P 8 site inspection memo Ex.P.9 site plan, Ex.P. 10 inquest report and Ex.P-11 panchnama, to the officer-in- charge, Police Station, Sedwa to the effect that in pursuance of Inquest No. 3/93 of Police Station, Sedwa relating to death of Smt. Chooni w/o Kheraj, it was reminded that earlier also vide his office letter No. 692 dated 27.8.93 it was requested that an F.I.R. may be registered against four accused persons named therein and it was again reminded and insisted upon the Officer-in-charge that the following four persons were responsible for the death of Smt. Chooni and, therefore, an F.I.R. be registered and legal action be initiated: 1. Shri Dhanna s/o Likhina Jat, r/o Khambrai 2. Smt. Kami v/o Dhanna Jat, r/b Khambrai 3.Shri Thakr s/o Sagra Jat, r/o Bamrla 4. Smt. Lachhi w/o Segra Jat, r/o Bamrla. On receipt of Ex.P. 1 on 22.10.93 at 6 P.M., P.W.5 Daulat Singh, Officer-in-charge, Police Station, Sedwa registered F.I.R. No. 54/93 ( Ex.P.2) under Sections 304B and 201, Indian Penal Code and started investigation. He also inspected the site and prepared Ex.P. 3 site plan. Both the appellants accused were arrested. As a result of investigation, it was revealed that Smt. Chooni, who was daughter of P.W. 8 Gaina Ram and P.W. 2 Smt. Dami, was married to the appellant Kheraj who is brother of his co-appellant Dhanna Ram. P.W. 4 Khuma Ram, who is son of Gaina Ram, was already married to Smt. Puro who is a sister of appellants but, for quite some time, Smt. Puro had deserted Khuma Ram and was leaving at her parents, house. The marriage of Smt. Chooni was celebrated in the early year of 1993 before Holi. She was brought back on the festival of Holi and was sent back to her in laws' house with kesa. Again on following "Akshaya Tritiya", Khuma Ram fetched back Smt. Chooni to her parents' house. It was alleged by the parents and the brother of the deceased Smt. Chooni that she was complaining that the appellants and their brothers used to taunt and scold her for not bringing valuable clothes, ornaments etc. as dowry and she used to be physically tortured and harassed. Last time, after 7 & 8 days' of return of Smt. Chooni, as above, appellant Kheraj came to his inlaw's house at the village Bamarli and insisted for sending Smt. Chooni with him. However, Smt. Chooni's parents told him that they would arrange for new clothes etc and would only send her on the assurance of four or more persons so that she is not harassed. Kheraj whet away alone. After 7 & 8 days, both the appellants came to the house of Gaina Ram and tried to take back Smt. Chooni forcibly with them. However, her parents were not agreeable to it. Appellants beat P.Ws. Gaina Ram Smt. Dami and Khuma Ram who unsuccessful attempted to resist and, lastly appellants left with Smt. Chooni. This incident was allegedly reported to the Sedwa Police Station on 3.5.93 where at F.I.R. No. 17/93 under Sections 353/323, Indian Penal Code was registered. Smt. Chooni was kept in the night at ogala whereat a well and field of the appellants were situate and, in the next night, she was taken to the 'dhanf of Sagra Ram in the village Bamarli itself which is also village of Gaina Ram. It was in the morning of 5



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top