1. The order dated, 29.2.92 passed by the learned Additional Munsiff No. 1, Bharatpur, is under challenge in this revision petition.

2. The facts of the case have been set out by me in detail while disposing of the revision petition No. 809/92 (defect) (Ramji Lal v. Bhoop Singh) and, therefore, it is not necessary to give detailed facts of this case. Suffice it to say that in a suit filed by the plaintiff-nonpetitioner on 16.7.83 for rent and ejectment against the defendant-petitioner, issues were framed on 13.11.84. Evidence of the plaintiff was closed on 10.4.89. Defendant -petitioner examined himself on 4.12.89. One application filed under Order-13 Rule 2 C.P.C. On 16.1.85 was allowed by the trial court on 30.10.85. Second application filed by him under Order 13 Rule-2 on 19.2.90 was dismissed by the learned trial court by a detailed order dated, 23.7.90. On 24.9.90, the defendant-petitioner filed two applications one under Order 16 Rule 3 read with section 151 C.P.C. and the other under Order 13 Rule 2 read with order-8 Rule-1 (6) and Section 151 C.P.C.

3. Learned Additional Munsiff has rejected both the applications by the impugned order dated, 29.2.92. Shri Maloo, le