G.S.SINGHVI
Murlidhar – Appellant
Versus
Mukand Ram – Respondent
र 10/-. The rent was paid to the predecessor in title of the landlord. Subsequently, the rent was increased from time to time, and, in the last the tenant has been paying the rent of र 35/-per month. The landlord wanted the vacation of tenanted premises, but, the tenant declined to do the same. Thereafter, the landlord stopped accepting the rent, although, the tenant had offered the same to the landlord on many occasions. He also asked the landlord to give the account number, but, the la
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.