SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Raj) 946

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
Anshuman Singh, J.
M/s Bhanu Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. & anr. - Appellant
Versus
The District Level Screening Committees & ors. - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 916 of 1992.
Decided On : 7-11-1994

The court emphasized that the appeal should have been decided on merit rather than being rejected on the question of limitation.

Headnote:

Incentive Deferment Scheme - Small Scale Industry - The court found that the Tribunal misdirected itself in rejecting the appeal of the petitioner as barred by time instead of deciding the same on merit. The order of the Tribunal was quashed and the matter was remanded back to the Tribunal with a direction to decide the appeal on merit.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a Small Scale Industry, applied for an incentive deferment scheme after establishing a new unit. The application was rejected, and the petitioner appealed to the Tribunal, which rejected the appeal as barred by time.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Tribunal misdirected itself in rejecting the appeal of the petitioner as barred by time instead of deciding the same on merit.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner was entitled to the benefit of the deferment scheme or not, and whether the unit of the petitioner was newly established or merely a change of place of business.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Tribunal should have decided the appeal on merit instead of throwing it on the question of limitation, and that the order of the District Level Screening Committee did not contain any reason and was not sustainable in the eyes of the law.

Final Decision: The order of the Tribunal was quashed, and the matter was remanded back to the Tribunal with a direction to decide the appeal on merit.

JUDGMENT

1. - The facts giving rise to this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India briefly stated are as under:-

2. The petitioner is a Small Scale Industry and his Company is registered with the Registrar of Companies under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 and also with the District Industries Centre, Jaipur. The petitioner-Company is also registered with the Assistant Commercial Taxes Officer, 'E' Circle, Jaipur under the provisions of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act. the petitioner-Company initially produced small quantity of Sulphur Black in the year 1985-86. He mixed various ingredients manually. The sale of such products was not commercially profitable. Petitioner-Company therefore, took the land at Vishwakarma Industrial Area, Jaipur on 10.12.87 and got it registered with the District Industrial Centre, Jaipur vide registration dated 16.12.88. Loan for the above business was also sanctioned by the Rajasthan Financial Corporation on 6.1.88. Subsequently, the Company with full infrastructure started commercial production in July, 1989. The petitioner submitted an application to the District Industries Centre, Jaipur on 28.11.89 for grant of incentive deferment scheme. District Industries Centre, Jaipur issued letter dated 23.11.90 communicating the petitioner that ,his application for grant of incentive was rejected by the Managing Director, District Level Screening Committee on 16.10.90 under clause 2(a)(i) of the New Deferment Scheme on the ground that previously the industrial unit for the petitioner was in operation at some other place and he merely changed the place of business. Aggrieved against the order petitioner preferred an appeal before the Rajasthan Sales Tax Tribunal, Ajmer which was rejected vide order dated 14.10.91. Now, the petitioner has come to this Court in the instant writ petition.

3. I have heard Shri R.B. Mathur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri G.S. Bapna, learned counsel for the respondetns. The learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently urged that the Tribunal committed an error in rejecting the appeal of the petitioner as barred by limitation. He further contended that no objection regarding limitation was raised by the Department before the District Level Screening Committee and the District Level Screening Committee rejected the claim of the petitioner on merit and as such Tribunal should have also decided the appeal of the petitioner on merit instead of throwing it on the question of limitation. The learned counsel for the petitioner-Company urged that since the Department did not raise any objection regarding limitation before the Committee it was estopped from raising the same for the first time before the Tribunal. Mr.G.S. Bapna, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents contended that the question of limitation was a question of law and as such it was rightly raised before the Tribunal at appellate stage. The said contention does not appear to be tenable in as much as the question of limitation is a mixed question of law and fact and moreover in case the Tribunal permitted the question of limitation to be raised at appellate stage then, it would have been more proper on the part of the Tribunal to have remanded the case to the District Level Screening Committee when the application of the petitioner was rejected purely on merit. I have also perused the proceedings of the District Level Screening Committee dated 20.11.90, Annexure-8 to the writ petition and I find that the case of the petitioner was considered by the Committee on merit. I would like to express that the order passed by the District Level Screening Committee though purely on merit it is in fact no order in the eyes of law in as much as it does not contain any reason. The claim of the petitioner was rejected by the District Level Screening Committee by passing a very cryptic order, which runs as under:- HINDI MATTER 365034

4. From the narration of the aforesaid facts it is crystal cle





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top