SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Raj) 734

D.L.MEHTA, G.S.SINGHVI
Manak Chand Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - Petitioner, Manak Chand, Public Prosecutor, filed this writ petition before this Court on 16th July 1990 and prayed therein that the respondents maybe restrained from terminating the services of the petitioner as Public Prosecutor, Ajmer District or, in the alternative not to terminate the services of the petitioner till 30th June, 1993. It was also prayed that a new appointment is made during the intervening period, then the Court should declare that the present Public Prosecutor that who has been appointed vide order dated, 9-2-90 (Annex. 9), shall continue to hold the office of Public Prosecutor till the expiry of his term of appointment. During the intervering period Shri Vasant Vijay Vargiya was appointed as Public Prosecutor as such, the writ petition was amended by the present petitioner and further prayer was made that appointment of Shri Vasant Vijay Vargiya may be declared illegal and the present petitioner should be allowed to hold the office of Public Prosecutor till 30th June, 1993.

2. State Government issued wireless message to the District Magistrates of 14 districts requesting them to send the panel of Public Prosecutors and Additional Public Prosecutor














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top