SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Raj) 816

N.L.TIBREWAL
K. S. Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:S.P. Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent: M.K. Kaushik, P.P.

JUDGMENT

1. - This petition under section - 482 Cr. P.C. has been filed by the petitioner for expunging observations/ remarks made by this Court in the order dated July 4, 1989 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 540/1989 and S.B. Cr. Misc. petition No. 314/1989.

2. The petitioner is a member of Rajasthan Judicial (sic Higher Judicial) Service and at the relevant time, he was posted as Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Deeg. In the above Court, sessions Case No. 37/84 State v. Hari Singh and others was pending for trial. It was the oldest sessions case in the said court, though it was at the fag end for disposal, in as much as, only final arguments were to take place. However, the arguments could riot take place and the case could not be decided on account of several adjournments sought on behalf of the accused-persons as they wanted to get one criminal case, arising out of the same incident, pending in the court of Addl. Munsiff and judicial Magistrate, Deeg, transferred to the court of Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Deeg.On January 4,1989, the Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Deeg rejected the application moved by the accused persons again seeking adjournment in the sessi
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top