1. - This petition has been filed with a prayer that order dated August 30, 1988 (Ex. 12), by which, the petitioner was given punishment by the Disciplinary Authority and order dated August 18, 1989 (Ex. 17), by which, the Appellate Authority rejected the appeal of petitioner and enhanced the punishment be quashed and set aside with all consequential benefits.

2. The petitioner was working as Inspector in the office of respondent No. 1 and was served with a charge-sheet on May 31, 1933, the copy of which has been filed and marked Ex. 1. The petitioner filed his reply on July 29, 1983, the copy of which has been produced and marked Ex. 2. Witnesses were examined on behalf of the respondents as also on behalf of the petitioner, copies of whose statements have been filed and marked Ex. 3 to Ex. 10. The Disciplinary Authority inflicted a punishment of censure against the petitioner vide order dated August 30, 1988 (Ex. 12).

3. The contention of Shri R.C. Joshi, learned counsel, is that copy of enquiry report was not given to the petitioner inspite of his letter dated September 14, 1988 (Ex. 13). The petitioner had, therefore, no alternate remedy, but to file the appeal within li