SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Raj) 714

R.S.KEJRIWAL
Reejhu Mal – Appellant
Versus
Dwarka Das – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. (Oral)- This appeal has been directed against the order dated 4-3-1989, passed by learned Additional District Judge No. 2, Kota, in Civil Suit No. 72/1986 (95/88), by which he determined the arrears of rent from 1st March, 1983 to 28th February, 1989, at the rate of Rs. 600/- p.m. The total amount of arrears of rent determined by the learned judge was Rs. 43,200/-. The learned Judge further determined interest on the said amount at the rate of 6% p.a. The interest amount comes to Rs. 7,776/-. Thus the total amount determined comes to Rs. 50,976/-. The learned Judge further directed the appellants to deposit the said amount within a period of 15 days and to deposit the monthly amount of rent at the rate of Rs. 600/- p.m. by 15th of next month.

2. Being aggrieved with the said order, the defendant appellants have preferred this miscellaneous appeal under Section 22 (1) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act').

3. I have heard learned counsel for the appellants Shri Prem Asopa and learned counsel for the respondent Shri A. K. Gupta. It was argued by Shri Asopa that the learned Judge did not consider the affidav






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top