1990 Supreme(Raj) 743
M.R.CALLA
Vaidya Ganpati Lal Harit – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. - Through this writ petition the petitioner seeks to challenge the adverse remarks recorded against him for the year 1985-86 and the order dated 9th January, 1987 (Annex.1) whereby the adverse remarks were communicated and the order dated 2nd June, 1987 (Annex.8) whereby the petitioner's representation against adverse remarks has been rejected.
2. The petitioner is a District Ayurved Officer. During the relevant period 1985-86 he was posted as District Ayurved Officer Jhunjhunu. By a communication dated 9th January 1987 sent to him the Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms Government of Rajasthan the petitioner was conveyed the following adverse remarks in his Annual Performance Appraisal Report 1985-86 :
'There were complaints about his work and his general reputation was not good. Not yet fit for promotion."
3. Against the above communication the petitioner submitted a representation under his covering letter dated 2nd February, 1987 along with some documents. This representation was rejected by the order Annx.8 dated 2nd June, 1987. It was mentioned in this order dated 2nd June, 1987, that there was no reason to expunge the remarks conveyed vide letter date
Click Here to Read the rest of this document