SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Raj) 798

V.K.SINGHAL
Mangilal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - This criminal Revision Petition has been filed against the judgment passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Bayana in Cr. Revision Petition No. 41/1991 dated July 7, 1992 whereby the Revision Petition filed by Deendayal and Kanchan has been allowed and the cognizance taken against them under Sections 467, 471, 167, 474 and 120-B Indian Penal Code has been quashed.

2. I have gone through the order passed in Revision Petition whereby the order passed by the learned Trial Court on December 6, 1990 was set aside on the ground that necessary permission of the State Government was not obtained. The petitioner has alleged that the order dated 7.7.1992 is not in accordance with law and is perverse inasmuch as the Trial Court came to the conclusion that a prima facie case was made out against the accused persons. Deendayal who was posted as Patwari at the relevant time without any orders from the competent authority and without any justification struck off the name of the complainant petitioner from the Jamabandi and entered the name of Gyasi in the Jamabandi of the land bearing Khasra No. 514 measuring 2 bighas situated in village Sewla. The non-petitioner No. 3 was working as Sar




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top