1. - While the Civil Judge, Bikaner by her decree dated March 31, 1971 declared that the order dated July 17, 1962 of the defendant No. 1 (Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Napasar) and any other terminating the services of the plaintiff as Secretary was void and ineffective and that the plaintiff continued to remain in service and further passed a decree in plaintiff's favour for Rs. 5320/- on account of arrears of pay. but on the filing of Civil First Appeal No. 6 of 1971 by defendants Nos. 1 and 2, the District Judge. Bikaner by his decree dated February 11, 1975 reversed the decree of the Civil Judge in its entirety and dismissed the suit of Mahadeo plaintiff with costs throughout, leading the plaintiff to file the present second appeal in this Court.

2. Shorn of all unnecessary details, it is an undisputed fact that Mahadeo plaintiff was Secretary of Gram Panchayat, Napasrar on 15 6-1960 and that by order dated 17-7-62 of the defendant No. 1, services of the plaintiff were terminated. The plaintiff made a representation to the defendant No.] and also filed an appeal against the order of termination of his service before the Panchayat Samiti, Bikaner. The Panchayat Samiti by i