RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
M.B.Sharma, J.
Laxmi Narain Mathur - Appellant
Versus
High Court of Judicature For Rajasthan and Anr. - Respondent
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 545 of 1988.
Decided On : 15-09-1988
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT - PROMOTION - DY. REGISTRAR (ADMINISTRATION) - CHANNEL OF PROMOTION - INTERLACED SENIORITY - CRITERIA - GUIDELINES - CHIEF JUSTICE'S POWERS - RULES AND ORDERS - INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Private Secretary-cum-judjement Writer, challenged the promotion of the respondent, an Assistant Registrar, to the post of Dy. Registrar (Administration) on the ground that the channel of promotion was not properly followed and that the Chief Justice had not laid down any criteria or guidelines for fixing the interlaced seniority of the two categories of posts.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the Chief Justice had the power to specify the method of recruitment and qualifications for appointment to various posts in the High Court, including the post of Dy. Registrar (Administration), but that the order issued by the Chief Justice did not provide any criteria or guidelines for determining the interlaced seniority of Assistant Registrars and Private Secretaries-cum-judjement Writers for promotion to the post of Dy. Registrar (Administration). The court also held that Rule 4A of the Rajasthan High Court (Conditions of Service of Staff) Rules, 1953, which empowered the Chief Justice to determine the seniority of persons appointed to the same category of posts, did not apply to the case at hand, as the posts of Assistant Registrar and Private Secretary-cum-judjement Writer were not of the same category.
Issues: 1. Whether the Chief Justice had the power to specify the method of recruitment and qualifications for appointment to the post of Dy. Registrar (Administration)? 2. Whether the order issued by the Chief Justice provided any criteria or guidelines for determining the interlaced seniority of Assistant Registrars and Private Secretaries-cum-judjement Writers for promotion to the post of Dy. Registrar (Administration)? 3. Whether Rule 4A of the Rajasthan High Court (Conditions of Service of Staff) Rules, 1953, applied to the case at hand?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. Yes, the Chief Justice had the power to specify the method of recruitment and qualifications for appointment to the post of Dy. Registrar (Administration) under Rule 2A of the Rajasthan High Court (Conditions of Service of Staff) Rules, 1953. 2. No, the order issued by the Chief Justice did not provide any criteria or guidelines for determining the interlaced seniority of Assistant Registrars and Private Secretaries-cum-judjement Writers for promotion to the post of Dy. Registrar (Administration). 3. No, Rule 4A of the Rajasthan High Court (Conditions of Service of Staff) Rules, 1953, did not apply to the case at hand, as the posts of Assistant Registrar and Private Secretary-cum-judjement Writer were not of the same category.
Final Decision: The court directed the Chief Justice to suitably amend the Rules or to make orders under powers vested in him under the Rules either to lay down guidelines/criteria for promotion and determination of interlaced seniority of Asstt. Registrar & Private Secretaries and judjement Writers for appointment by selection to the post of Dy. Registrar (Admn.) or to lay down the ratio or proportion for appointment by selection to the post of Dy. Registrar (Admn.) from amongst the Asstt. Registrars and Private Secretaries and judjement Writers as he may deem proper.
"8. Promotion: Subject to the requirements of efficiency promotion shall ordinarily be made according to seniority. An official may receive promotion for recognised merit irrespective of the grade to which he may belong or of his seniority within the grade.
9. Promotion to posts carrying special responsibility or requiring special qualifications:
(1) Not with standing any thing to the contrary contained in these Rules, promotions to the following posts carrying special responsibility or requiring special qualifications shall be made by selection;
(1) De
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.