1983 Supreme(Raj) 547
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
G.M.Lodha, N.M.Kasliwal, Dr.K.S.Sidhu, JJ.
Rajmal Mehta - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan and others - Respondent
F.B.C. W.P. No. 315 of 1983.
Decided On : 1-12-1983
For the Petitioner:R.C. Joshi, Advocate.
For the Respondent:N.L. Jain, Advocate General.
The Governor has the power to make rules under Article 309 of the Constitution, and that the rules made under Article 309 are not subject to the rules made under an Act of the Legislature.
Headnote:
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 - ARTICLES 309, 14 - RAJASTHAN PANCHAYAT SAMITIS AND ZILA PARISHADS ACT, 1959 (RAJASTHAN ACT 37 OF 1959) - SECTIONS 26, 79(1) - RAJASTHAN CIVIL SERVICES (SPECIAL SELECTION AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF SERVICE OF VIKAS ADHIKARIS) RULES, 1982 - RAJASTHAN PANCHAYAT SAMITIS (SELECTION OF VIKAS ADHIKARIS) RULES, 1968 - VALIDITY - REPEAL - SCOPE OF ARTICLE 309 - POWER OF GOVERNOR TO MAKE RULES - EXTENT AND LIMITATIONS - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GOVERNOR AND STATE GOVERNMENT - INTERPRETATION OF GENERAL CLAUSES ACT, 1897 - SECTION 367 OF THE CONSTITUTION - APPLICABILITY - DISTINCTION BETWEEN RULES MADE UNDER AN ACT AND RULES MADE BY THE GOVERNOR - EFFECT OF RULES MADE UNDER ARTICLE 309 ON RULES MADE UNDER AN ACT - VALIDITY OF 1982 RULES - WHETHER VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLE 14.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a member of the Rajasthan Agriculture Subordinate Service, challenged the validity of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Special Selection and Special Conditions of Service of Vikas Adhikaris) Rules, 1982 (1982 Rules), made by the Governor under Article 309 of the Constitution, on the ground that they repealed the Rajasthan Panchayat Samitis (Selection of Vikas Adhikaris) Rules, 1968 (1968 Rules), made by the State Government under the Rajasthan Panchayat Samitis and Zila Parishads Act, 1959 (the Act), and thereby deprived him of his eligibility for appointment as a Vikas Adhikari. The petitioner argued that the Governor could not repeal the 1968 Rules made by the State Government under the Act.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that the 1982 Rules were valid and operative and that the petitioner was not eligible for selection for appointment on deputation as a Vikas Adhikari. The Court found that the Governor had the power to make rules under Article 309 of the Constitution, and that the 1982 Rules were not violative of the petitioner's fundamental right of equality before the law and equal protection of the laws guaranteed by Article 14 of the Constitution.
Issues: 1. Whether the Governor had the power to repeal the 1968 Rules made by the State Government under the Act? 2. Whether the 1982 Rules were violative of the petitioner's fundamental right of equality before the law and equal protection of the laws guaranteed by Article 14 of the Constitution?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Court held that the Governor had the power to make rules under Article 309 of the Constitution, and that the 1982 Rules were not violative of the petitioner's fundamental right of equality before the law and equal protection of the laws guaranteed by Article 14 of the Constitution. 2. The Court held that the Governor had the power to repeal the 1968 Rules made by the State Government under the Act, as the 1982 Rules were made under Article 309 of the Constitution, which is a higher law than the Act.
Final Decision: The Court dismissed the petition, holding that the 1982 Rules were valid and operative and that the petitioner was not eligible for selection for appointment on deputation as a Vikas Adhikari.
(a) Rajasthan Animal Husbandry Service Group C. II.
(b) Rajasthan Agriculture Subordinate Service
(c) Non R.A.S.
Provided that any order made or action taken under the rules and orders so repealed shall be deemed to have been made and taken under the provisions of these rules.
"Art. 309 Recruitment and conditions of service of persons serving the Union or a State subject to the provisions of this Constitution, Acts of the appropriate Legislature may regulate the recruitment, and conditions of service of persons appointed to public services and posts in connection with the Union or of any State:-
Provided that it shall be competent for the President or such person as he may direct in the case of services and posts in connection with the affairs of the Union, and for the Government of a State or such person as he may direct in the case of services and posts in connection with the affairs of the State, to make rules regulating the recruitment, and the conditions of service of persons appointed, to such services and posts until provision in that behalf is made by or under an Act of the appropriate Legislature under this article, and any rules so made shall have effect subject to the provisions of any such Act."
The Governor under the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution is empowered to make rules regulating the recruitment, and the conditions of service of persons appointed to services and posts in connection with the affairs of a State. The main part of Article 309 of the Constitution lays down that subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the Legislature may itself regulate the recruitment. and conditions of service of persons appointed to public services and posts in connection with the affairs of the Union or of any State by appropriate Acts. Thus, the appropriate Legislatures are given the function to make Acts for regulate the recruitment and conditions of Public Services and posts and the proviso further empower, the Governor to make such rules but it is subject to the condition that until provision in that behalf is made by or under an Act of the appropriate Legislature under this Article and any rules so made shall have effect subject to the provisions of any such Act. First point to be conside