1988 Supreme(Raj) 648
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
S.S.Byas, J.
M/s. Toyal Bros. - Appellant
Versus
Gram Panchayat Chicharwari - Respondent
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 583 of 1983.
Decided On : 19-07-1988
A Panchayat is not empowered to levy vehicle tax on a motor vehicle within the meaning of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939.
Headnote:
PANCHAYAT TAX - Vehicle Tax - Exemption - Motor Vehicles - Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1953, Section 64 - Rajasthan Panchayat and Nyay-Panchayat (General) Rules, 1961, Rule 113 - A Panchayat is not empowered to levy vehicle tax in respect of a vehicle if the vehicle is a motor vehicle within the meaning of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1939.
Fact of the Case:
The plaintiff, a mining leaseholder, challenged the imposition of Vehicle Tax by the Gram Panchayat on the grounds that the Panchayat had no powers to impose such a tax and that the tax was virtually a tax on the mineral produce, which the Panchayat also had no authority to impose.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the Panchayat was not empowered to levy vehicle tax on the plaintiff's trucks and tractors, as they were motor vehicles within the meaning of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, and were therefore exempt from such tax under Rule 113 of the Rajasthan Panchayat and Nyay-Panchayat (General) Rules, 1961.
Issues: 1. Whether the Panchayat had the power to impose vehicle tax on the plaintiff's trucks and tractors. 2. Whether the tax imposed was a tax on the mineral produce, which the Panchayat had no authority to impose.
Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted Section 64 of the Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1953, and Rule 113 of the Rajasthan Panchayat and Nyay-Panchayat (General) Rules, 1961, and held that a Panchayat is not empowered to levy vehicle tax on a motor vehicle within the meaning of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939.
Final Decision: The court allowed the plaintiff's revision petition, set aside the orders of the lower courts, and granted a temporary injunction restraining the Panchayat from levying tax on the plaintiff's motor vehicles.
1. No tax on Motor Vehicles could be imposed by the Panchayat as it had on powers and jurisdiction and.
2. The tax imposed is virtually a tax on the mineral produce. The Panchavat again has no powers and authority to impose tax on mineral produce.
Simultaneously, with the institution of the suit, the plaintiff presented an application for temporary injunction directing the defendant-panchayat not to collect tax from him during the pendency of the suit. The application was resisted and opposed by the defendant-Panchayat. The Learned Munsif heard the parties and by his order dated 13 1.83 dismissed the plaintiff's application and declined to issue the temporary injunction The plaintiff went in appeal which was heard and dismissed by the Addl. District Judge; Deeg by his order dated 5.8.83. The plaintiff is a now come up in revision. Despite service of notice on the non-petitioner, nobody put appearance on its behalf. The revision was, therefore, heard ex-parte. I have heard Mr. N.K. Maloo learned counsel for the plaintiff - petitioner.