SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Raj) 648

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
S.S.Byas, J.
M/s. Toyal Bros. - Appellant
Versus
Gram Panchayat Chicharwari - Respondent
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 583 of 1983.
Decided On : 19-07-1988

A Panchayat is not empowered to levy vehicle tax on a motor vehicle within the meaning of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939.

Headnote:

PANCHAYAT TAX - Vehicle Tax - Exemption - Motor Vehicles - Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1953, Section 64 - Rajasthan Panchayat and Nyay-Panchayat (General) Rules, 1961, Rule 113 - A Panchayat is not empowered to levy vehicle tax in respect of a vehicle if the vehicle is a motor vehicle within the meaning of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1939.

Fact of the Case:

The plaintiff, a mining leaseholder, challenged the imposition of Vehicle Tax by the Gram Panchayat on the grounds that the Panchayat had no powers to impose such a tax and that the tax was virtually a tax on the mineral produce, which the Panchayat also had no authority to impose.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the Panchayat was not empowered to levy vehicle tax on the plaintiff's trucks and tractors, as they were motor vehicles within the meaning of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, and were therefore exempt from such tax under Rule 113 of the Rajasthan Panchayat and Nyay-Panchayat (General) Rules, 1961.

Issues: 1. Whether the Panchayat had the power to impose vehicle tax on the plaintiff's trucks and tractors. 2. Whether the tax imposed was a tax on the mineral produce, which the Panchayat had no authority to impose.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted Section 64 of the Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1953, and Rule 113 of the Rajasthan Panchayat and Nyay-Panchayat (General) Rules, 1961, and held that a Panchayat is not empowered to levy vehicle tax on a motor vehicle within the meaning of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939.

Final Decision: The court allowed the plaintiff's revision petition, set aside the orders of the lower courts, and granted a temporary injunction restraining the Panchayat from levying tax on the plaintiff's motor vehicles.

JUDGMENT

1. - This is a plaintiff's revision petition against the order of the Addl. District Judge. Deep dated August 5, 1983 by which he dismissed his appeal and confirmed the order passed by the Munsiff Kama by which the petitioners' application for temporary injunction under order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the C. P. C. was dismissed.

2. The plaintiff instituted a suit in the court of Munsiff Kama, challenging the imposition of Vehicle Tax by the Gram Panchayat Chichorwari. The case set up by the Plaintiff is that he obtained a mining lease in village Seu where he excavates building stones. He transports the building stone, of his lease hold quarry to various places through Trucks Tractors and Trollies These Trucks, Trollies and Tractors hive to pass through the local limits of the defendant- Panchayat. The defendant-Panchayat issued a notice to the plaintiff on 16 10.92 whereby he was directed to ply Baheti Tax on Transportation of Minerals at the rate of Rs. 5/- per Truck, Rs. 2/ - per Trolly, Rs. 1/- per Buliack Cart and 0.10 paise per annum The plaintiff challenged this imposition of tax mainly on two grounds viz.-

1. No tax on Motor Vehicles could be imposed by the Panchayat as it had on powers and jurisdiction and.

2. The tax imposed is virtually a tax on the mineral produce. The Panchavat again has no powers and authority to impose tax on mineral produce.
Simultaneously, with the institution of the suit, the plaintiff presented an application for temporary injunction directing the defendant-panchayat not to collect tax from him during the pendency of the suit. The application was resisted and opposed by the defendant-Panchayat. The Learned Munsif heard the parties and by his order dated 13 1.83 dismissed the plaintiff's application and declined to issue the temporary injunction The plaintiff went in appeal which was heard and dismissed by the Addl. District Judge; Deeg by his order dated 5.8.83. The plaintiff is a now come up in revision. Despite service of notice on the non-petitioner, nobody put appearance on its behalf. The revision was, therefore, heard ex-parte. I have heard Mr. N.K. Maloo learned counsel for the plaintiff - petitioner.

3. It was contended by Mr. Maloo that the entire approach of the courts below is erroneous and unsustainable. Section 64 of the Rajasthan Panchayat Act. 1953 (hereinafter) no doubt empowers a Panchayat to levy vehicles tax. But this provision has to be read with Rules 112 & 113 of the Rajasthan Panchayat and Nyay-Panchayat (General) Rules. 1961. Rule 113 exempts certain vehicles from the tax under the Act. Clause (a) of this Rule 113 clearly lays down that no tax can be levied on the vehicle which is a motor vehicle within the meaning of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. It was also argued that the tax imposed by the Panchayat is a tax not on the vehicles but on the minerals. The Panchayat is not empowered to levy tax on the minerals. Section 64 does not permit a Panchayat to leavy and tax on a mineral produce. I have taken the submissions into consideration. The submissions made by Mr. Maloo are not without force.

4. Section 64 of the Act empowers a Panchayat to impose taxes. Clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 64 lays down that a Panchayat may impose tax on the vehicles except on those vehicles which are used for the purpose of cultivation. Rule 113 of the rules speaks about the exemptions. Clause (b) of this rule lays down that no vehicle tax shall be leviable in respect of a vehicle if it is a motor vehicle within the meaning of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939.

5. Section 64 of the Act and Rule 113 of the Rules are to be read together. The section empowers a Panchayat to impose tax whereas Rule 113 carves out the exemption from vehicle tax When these two provisions i. e. Sec, 64 and Rule 113 are read together, the position which appears is that a Panchayat is not empowered to levy vehicle tax in respect of a vehicle if the vehicle is a motor vehicle within the meaning of the Motor Vehicle Ac






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top