SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Raj) 733

GUMAN MAL LODHA
Kishore Singh – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Singh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - No compensation, much less compensation, all under compulsion, compromise wether legal socio-economic exploitation of tears of widow? Rs. 3,000/- compensation for human life, insulting and annoying and less than funeral and death ritual expenses, whether is rape on "Social Justice' when we are in "Socialist Era" of Constitution, preparing for 21st Century? Social Security Laws Protective Umbrella' for minors, widows, destitutes handicapped whether reduced to mockery and joke only? Would the 'eyes' of Goddess of Justicia at least now open eyes to see Social COMA & Vulgarity to human suffering?

2. A case of ridiculous record for Ginnis Book of World Records. Shameful for "Social Justice' and shameless accident death claim auctioneers, 'Social Justice' betrayed or unmasked when compensation disparity of sea to sky gets Judicial Seal? Rs. 3,000/- for Hari Singh a cyclewala age 28 years more than Rs. 50,000/- for Dheer Singh a motorwala, age 38 years. Gunwant Kumari w/o Dhir Singh v. Sadhu Singh 1987(2) WLN 714 . Birth as well as death, by accident.

3. Rs. 5,000/- solatium compensation for unknown vehicle accident, Rs. 15,000/- compensation Under Section 92-A of Motor Vehic





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top