SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Raj) 719

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
N.L.Kasliwal, J.
Municipal Council, Kota - Appellant
Versus
J.K. Synthetics Ltd., Kota - Respondent
S.B. Civil Revision Petition Nos. 678 of 1987 and similar 3 other Revision Petitions No. 679, 680 and 693 of 1987.
Decided On : 19-08-1988

The levy and realization of octroi can be challenged in a Civil Court if the levy itself is unconstitutional and illegal.

Headnote:

MUNICIPAL LAW - OCTROI - EXEMPTION - JURISDICTION OF CIVIL COURT - BALANCE OF CONVENIENCE - IRREPARABLE LOSS - RETROSPECTIVITY OF NOTIFICATION - REFUND OF OCTROI ALREADY PAID - MAINTAINABILITY OF SUIT - SECTION 107(5) OF THE RAJASTHAN MUNICIPALITIES ACT, 1959 - RULE 14(8) OF THE RAJASTHAN MUNICIPALITIES (OCTROI) RULES, 1962 - SECTION 143 OF THE RAJASTHAN MUNICIPALITIES ACT, 1959.

Fact of the Case:

The plaintiff, M/s. J.K. Synthetics Ltd., filed four suits for an injunction restraining the Municipal Council, Kota from realizing any octroi on the raw material consumed in their factory for expanded capacity for a period from April 1, 1986 to March 31, 1988. The trial court dismissed the applications for temporary injunction, but the District Judge allowed the appeals filed by the plaintiff and set aside the first part of the order of the trial court and maintained the second part. The Municipal Council filed four revisions against the order of the District Judge.

Finding of the Court:

The High Court held that the plaintiff had a strong prima facie case of getting exemption from the levy of octroi on the raw material required for expanded production capacity from February 20, 1987 to March 31, 1988. However, the court held that there was no balance of convenience or irreparable loss to the plaintiff Company if no injunction was granted with regard to the period between April 1, 1986 to February 20, 1987, as the octroi had already been paid and spent by the Municipal Council for its public needs.

Issues: 1. Whether the Civil Court has jurisdiction to entertain a suit challenging the levy and realization of octroi? 2. Whether the exemption notification issued by the State Government is retrospective in operation? 3. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a refund of octroi already paid? 4. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an injunction restraining the Municipal Council from realizing octroi on the raw material used in the production of goods under the expanded capacity of the plaintiff Company?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Civil Court has jurisdiction to entertain a suit challenging the levy and realization of octroi if the levy itself is unconstitutional and illegal. 2. The exemption notification issued by the State Government is not retrospective in operation and cannot be applied to any raw material imported prior to the date of the notification. 3. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of octroi already paid in accordance with the procedure prescribed under the Octroi Rules. 4. The plaintiff is entitled to an injunction restraining the Municipal Council from realizing octroi on the raw material used in the production of goods under the expanded capacity of the plaintiff Company from February 20, 1987 to March 31, 1988.

Final Decision: The High Court allowed the revisions in part and set aside the judgment of the District Judge. The Municipal Council was restrained from realizing any octroi from February 20, 1987 to March 31, 1988 on the raw material brought within the limits of Municipal Council, Kota for expanded capacity as certified by the Industries Department in their order dated February 20, 1987.

JUDGMENT

1. - All the above mentioned revisions are disposed of by one single order as these revisions arise out of a common order passed by District Judge, Kota, dated September 8, 1987.

2. Brief facts of the case are that M/s. J.K. Synthetics Ltd., Kota (here-in-after referred to as 'the Company') filed tour suits for an injunction restraining the Municipal Council, Kota not to realise any octroi on the raw material consumed in their factory for expanded capacity for a period from April 1, 1986 to March, 31, 1988. Applications for temporary injunction were also filed alongwith the suits. Learned Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Kota (North) by his order dated August 22, 1987. dismissed all the four applications for temporary injunction tiled alongwith the suits. Learned Munsif while passing the above order gave the following direction in the last part of his order:

"izkFkhZ dEiuh }kjk izLrqr vLFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk ds pkjksa izkFkZuk&i= fo:) vkizkFkhZx.k vLohdkj fd;s tkrs gSaA vizkFkhZ dks ;g Hkh funsZ'k fn;s tkrs gSa fd os 20&2&87 ds vkns'k dh ikyuk esa ;fn izkFkhZ dEiuh foLrkj ls iwoZ dh {kerk ds dPps eky gsrq pqaxh vnk dj nsrk gS rks mls dsoy foLrkj dh xbZ {kerk ds fy, vk;kfrr eky ij pqaxh eqfDr dk ykHk nsosA"

3. The Company filed four appeals, which came up for consideration before the District Judge, Kota. Learned District Judge observed that the above order passed by Munsif can be divided in two parts Learned District Judge then observed that in the first part of the above order Munsif had dismissed the applications for temporary injunction while in the second part he had granted the entire relief to the company for which applications for temporary injunction were filed. According to the District Judge this had created an unusual situation. Learned District Judge then considered the case set up by both the parties and held that the argument of learned counsel for Municipal Council was not correct that no law can be given retrospective effect. It was held that the original order granting exemption was dated May 18, 1982 and the order dated February 20, 1987 was merely an order of compliance of the original order dated May 18, 1982 According to the District Judge the second reason for taking the aforesaid view was that the order dated February 20, 1987 itself mentioned that it was made effective from April 1, 1986. Whatever octroi so far been paid by the Company was on such raw material on which the octroi was already payable, In these circumstances there was no question of giving any retrospective operation to the Notification dated February 20, 1987. Learned District Judge then observed that the last reason for taking the above view was that learned counsel for the Company had not raised any argument for the refund of any amount of octroi already paid by the Company. Thus, according to the learned District Judge, there was no controversy at this stage regarding the payment of any additional octroi but the only question was to grant exemption on the expanded capacity of raw material.

4. Learned District Judge also repelled the contention at learned counsel for Municipal Council that the Civil Court had no jurisdiction to try the suit. Reliance in this regard was placed by the learned District Judge on (1) Singhai Tantilal v. City of Jabalpur Corporation, AIR 1960 M.P. 223 . Learned District Judge then decided the question of balance of convenience and irreparable loss also in favour of the Company Learned District Judge, in these circumstances, allowed all the four appeals filed by the Company and set aside the first part of the order of the Munsif and maintained the second part. Learned District Judge ultimately gave a direction that the Municipal Council, Kota shall grant exemption of octroi to the Company on the expanded capacity of raw material in compliance with the order dated February 20, 1987. It was also directed that the appellant Company would furnish the entire details regarding the import of raw material from April













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top