SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Raj) 723

G.M.LODHA
Kumari Bindu – Appellant
Versus
Chandra Shekhar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - In this appeal Kumari Bindu was injured in an accident by a pair. Claim for compensation of Rs. 1,20,000/- was filed. But the Tribunal allowed compensation only to the extent of Rs. 20,000/-.

2. It may be noticed that the injuries caused to Kumari Bindu are of serious nature and according to the medical evidence the plastic surgery of her leg will have to be repeated by grafting and regrafting three four times.

3. Dr. Keswani was consulted. Three doctors were examined including Dr. S.S. Chandalia of S.M.B. Jaipur, AW 2. According to Dr. Chandalia she remained in treatment from 7-8-1981 to 24-1-1981. There was fracture of Feeula 1 x 1 and 11/2 was the woon. She was referred for skin grafting. The skin efficiency has been reduced from. 60 percent to 50 percent according to this doctor. According to him operation will have to be preformed even now because complete cure has not taken place. Dr. Chandra Shekhar AW 3 was also examined and he also examined the patient. He signed 2 the ticket from A to B. According to him there was a compound fracture with skin loss, Skin grafting was to be done and so she was referred. There was one operation on 12-8-1981. Normal strength cann






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top