SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Raj) 468

K.D.SHARMA
Nahar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


For the Appellant:Shri P.K. Sharma, Advocates.
For the Respondent: Shri S.B. Mathur, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

1. Heard Mr. P.K. Sharma learned counsel for Naharsingh petitioner and Mr. S. B. Mathur learned public prosecutor for the State and perused all the relevant papers., This is a fourth application for anticipatory bail filed by Naharsingh in this Court. His previous applications were dismissed by three different judges of this Court. After going through the relevant papers and the fourth application the petitioner has prayed for grant of anticipatory bail on grounds. He has produced the Medical certificate showing that lie is suffering from hypertension and chest pain and is admitted in Medical Ward General Hospital Bharatpur since 30-10-82. Learned Public Prosecutor has contested the application for anticipatory bail mainly on the ground that three previous applications for anticipatory bail have been rejected by this court and the petitioner did not surrender himself in the court of learned Magistrate. Having considered all the facts and circumstances of the case and looking to facts that the petitioner is suffering from hypertension and chest pain and is admitted in the General Hospital, Bharatpur since 30-10-82, and that all other co-accused have been released on hail, I






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top