SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Raj) 543

N.M.KASLIWAL, S.C.AGRAWAL
Amarjeet Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - All these three cases arise in identical circumstances, as such they are disposed of by one single order.

2. The controversy raised in the present cases is that proceedings were initiated under Chapter III-B of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955. Those proceedings were ultimately dropped by order dated 14th January, 1971 by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Baran. Thereafter the Assistant Collector, Baran started afresh proceedings under the Rajasthan Imposition of Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1973 (here in after referred to as 'the new Ceiling Law'). The Assistant Collector, decided the case by order dated 28th February, 1976. An appeal against that order was filed before the Additional Collector, Kota. The Additional Collector, Kota by order dated 4th August, 1976 remanded the case to the Assistant Collector, Baran for determining the ceiling area afresh. The Assistant Collector after remand again decided the case. Aggrieved parties again went in appeal against these orders before the Additional Collector, Kota and the Additional Collector by order dated 4th April, 1985 remanded the case to the Assistant Collector, Shahbad for deciding the matter afresh under the new







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top