SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Raj) 871

D.L.MEHTA
Nazir Ahmed and anr – Appellant
Versus
Ashfaq Ali – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - Defendant-petitioner have preferred this revision petition being aggrieved with the order of the Additional District Judge No. 6, Jaipur City, Jaipur, reversing the order passed by the Additional Munsif Magistrate No. 2, dated 21-1-89 and thereby granting mandatory injunction in favour of the non-petitioner plaintiff.

2. Plaintiff -non-petitioner instituted a suit against the defendant-petitioner and submitted that they are tenants for the last number of years and they have been forcibly and without their consent ejected, on 14th January 1989. On 15th January was a holiday and on 16th the suit was instituted. In the suit it was stated that the articles which have been thrown out of their premises are worth lac of rupees and they are lying on the road. It was also submitted that the defendants took the law in their hands. in the suit the prayer was made that the mandatory injunction be issued against the defendants and they be directed to restore the possession of the shop which has been taken away by them forcibly on 14th January 1989. Further prayer was made that the articles which were thrown out of the shop are lying on the road and the plaintiff may be allowed to p



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top