SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Raj) 510

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
Suresh Chandra Agrawal, J.
Ramji Lal - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan and ors. - Respondent
Application in S.B.C.W.P. No. 665 of 1985.
Decided On : 12-07-1985

The necessary and proper party in a challenge to the validity of an order is determined based on the authority that passed the impugned order.

Headnote:

Impleaded - Gram Panchayat - The court dismissed the application for being impleaded as respondents, stating that the necessary and proper party can only be the State Government which has passed the impugned order.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat, challenged the validity of the order suspending him from office.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the application for being impleaded as respondents, stating that the necessary and proper party can only be the State Government which has passed the impugned order.

Issues: Challenge to the validity of the order suspending the petitioner from office.

Ratio Decidendi: The necessary and proper party in the present proceedings can only be the State Government which has passed the impugned order.

Final Decision: Application for being impleaded as respondents dismissed.

JUDGMENT

1. :- The applicants in this application for being impleaded as respondents are Panchas of Gram Panchayat, Naroli Dang, District Sawaimadhopur.

2. In the writ petition the petitioner who is Sarpanch of the said Gram Panchayat, has challenged the validity of the order passed by the State Government whereby the petitioner has been suspended from the office of Sarpanch. The applicants are seeking to be impleaded as parties on the ground that they had made a complaint against the petitioner and on the basis of the said complaint a preliminary enquiry was held and the impugned order of suspension was passed. It may be that the applicants made the complaint on the basis of which the impugned order of suspension was passed. But in so far as the present proceedings are concerned, the necessary and proper party can only be the State Government which has passed the impugned order. The applicants can neither be regarded as necessary parties nor they could be regarded as proper parties. The application is, therefore, dismissed.Application dismissed.

*******

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top