SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Raj) 778

VINOD SHANKAR DAVE
Raju Alias Raj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:N.A. Naqvi, Advocate.
For the Respondent: S.C. Sharma, P.P.

JUDGMENT

1. 1. This bail application is pending since 18-8-1987 and court wanted to know the antecedents of accused-petitioner Raju alias Raj Kumar, against whom the learned Sessions had mentioned that several cases are pending. The jail authorities were asked to produce the record of the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor had also been directed to keep the diary ready, as to in how many police stations the cases are pending against the petitioner and of what nature. Since the information could not be received on the earlier dates then two days' future timely granted However, it was mentioned that no further time shall be granted. When the case was called up today, neither the diary was produced nor an information about the antecedents of the case of the accused petitioner was furnished. It is disgusting to note that even in the matter of the accused against whom multiple cases are pending the police authorities are not vigilant and do not intend to assist the court in properly adjudicating upon the bail application It has been noticed during the last few days that even in the local cases from Jaipur, neither the informations are furnished nor the diaries are produced in






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top