SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Raj) 753

D.L.MEHTA
Radhey Shyam – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - This revision petition is directed against the order of the learned Addl. Civil Judge, No. 5, Jaipur City, J.,ipur, dated 27th July, 1985, in civil suit No. x22/1983.

2. Suit was instituted by the plaintiff against the State of Rajasthan and ors. for declaration that the dismissal order is bad in law. Summons were issued to the respondents and its officers. On 24th January, 1953, ex-parte order was passed. Application for setting-aside the ex-parte order was moved by the State and it was accepted on 20th July, 19'3. Ex-pane order was set-aside and 3 months time was granted to the State to file the written statement. On 19th October, 1983, written statement was not filed, hence further time was granted to the State. On 19th November 1983. also the written statement was n-)t filed and further time was allowed. On 18th January, 1984, again the written statement was not filed and the court allowed time on the condition that Rs. 50/- will be paid to the petitioner as cost.

3. On 4th February, 1984, written statement again was not filed and further time was allowed on the condition that the State will pay Rs. 75/- as cost. On 25.2.1984, written statement was not filed and aga

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top