1. - Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner entered the service of the Government of Rajasthan on December 12, 1943 and coatinued uptil the age of superannuation i.e. January 31, 1982. The petitioner was holding the post of Tehsildar, Fatehpur District Sikar at the time of his retirement. According to the petitioner, his service record had been neat and clean throughout his service period except an inquiry which was held by serving a chargesheet dated Nov. 17, 1971 under Rule 16 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958. The petitioner was given 3 charges, firstly, for making a wrong entry in Mutation No. 262 of Village Nimola. According to the petitioner he made this entry on April 24, 1975, on being entered the same by Revenue Inspector Shri Babu Lal. The petitioner had simply entered the mutation according to the entry made by Shri Babu Lal. Secondly, the petitioner was charged with regard to the mutation No. 264 having been done on April 24, 1975 upholding the entries made by the Revenue Inspector Babu Lal. In this charge it was also mentioned that the said village Nimola did not fall within the jurisdiction of the petiti