SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Raj) 661

G.K.SHARMA
Lakha Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:J.P. Goyal, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Om Prakash Sharma, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

1. The appellants have preferred this appeal against their conviction u/s 412 IPC, for which they have been sentenced to 1 year's rigorous imprisonment each and a fine of Rs. 500/- each; and in default of payment to undergo 3 months' rigorous imprisonment, vide judgment dated 28th August, 78 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge. Bharatpur.

2. The appellants along with other persons were tried for offences under section 395 & 397, IPC. The allegation against them was that on the intervening hight of 7th & 8th July, 75, in Village-Bandwas, a dacoity took place, and the dacoits took away ornaments from the houses of Roopram, Mangtu, Prabhati and Darola. It is alleged that 8-10 persons had come to the village and committed the dacoity.

3. On such report, the police investigated the matter and arrested 5 persons. It is alleged that during custody, the appellants accused gave information for recovery of certain ornaments, u/s 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, and on their information, ornaments were recovered. The police submitted a challan against 5 persons under sections 395 & 397, IPC. They were tried by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Bharatpur. The learned trial Judge framed charges aga










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top