SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Raj) 1822

RAJESH BALIA
Shankar Lal – Appellant
Versus
Bhanwar Lal – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Usman Gani, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Suresh Shrimali, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2. This Second appeal arises out of the Judgment and Decree passed by District Judge, No. 1, Bhilwara on 12.7.2001 evicting the appellants from the suit shop by affirming the judgment and decree passed by the Addl. Munsif and Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Bhilwara.

3. The respondent-plaintiff had filed a suit for eviction against the appellants as land-lord for evicting the appellants- defendants from the suit shop under the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 on two grounds; firstly that the defendants have defaulted In payment of rent after the death of their father Bhanwar Lal since October, 1983 and secondly the respondent-plaintiff requires to occupy and use the suit premises bona-fide for personal necessity. The suit has been decreed only on the basis of bona fide and reasonable requirement of his own use.

4. The suit shop measure 28' x 4' and the shop occupied by the plaintiff which is adjacent to the suit shop measures 28' x 7' 6". Both shops are situated in Sarafa Bazar, Bhilwara both the plaintiff and defendants are engaged in the business of dealing with articles of silver and gold. The need, which wa
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top