SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Raj) 854

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Jas Raj Chopra, J.
Prem Prakash Mirdha - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan - Respondent
S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No. 1077 of 1988.
Decided On : 17-11-1988

For the Petitioner:M.C. Bhandari and M.M. Singhvi, Advocates./Rajendra Choudhary and S.S. Byas, Public Prosecutor.
For the Complainant:N.K. Bohra, Advocate.

The court held that the accused persons were entitled to bail because the evidence against them was not strong, they were not likely to abscond or tamper with evidence, and they had no criminal history.

Headnote:

BAIL - SECTION 439 CRPC - SECTION 302, 307, 148, 149 IPC - Bail application filed by accused persons in a case of murder and attempt to murder - Accused persons were part of a group that attacked the office of a truck union, resulting in the death of one person and injuries to two others - Court considered the facts and circumstances of the case, including the nature of the offenses, the strength of the evidence against the accused persons, and the likelihood of their absconding or tampering with evidence - Court held that the accused persons were entitled to bail, subject to certain conditions.

Fact of the Case:

The accused persons were part of a group that attacked the office of a truck union, resulting in the death of one person and injuries to two others. The accused persons were charged with murder, attempt to murder, rioting, and unlawful assembly.

Finding of the Court:

The court considered the facts and circumstances of the case, including the nature of the offenses, the strength of the evidence against the accused persons, and the likelihood of their absconding or tampering with evidence. The court held that the accused persons were entitled to bail, subject to certain conditions.

Issues: Whether the accused persons were entitled to bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the accused persons were entitled to bail because the evidence against them was not strong, they were not likely to abscond or tamper with evidence, and they had no criminal history.

Final Decision: The court granted bail to the accused persons, subject to certain conditions.

JUDGMENT

1. - These two bail applications, one filed by Shri Prem Prakash and the other filed by Shri Kamal Kihore arise out of the same Cr. Case bearing No. 1,63/88 State v. Prem Prakash etc. registered on 12-9-1988 at 12.30 a.m. on the report of one Phaglu Ram who claims himself to be the president of the Truk Union Office of Bilara branch, Bilara. It is alleged against the accused persons that they came in two jeeps, along with the five persons, to the branch office of the Bilara Truck Union situated in Bilara. Three of them, i.e., Prem Prakash Mirdha, Umaid Singh Khoja and Ishak Khan were armed with pistols and the remaining accused-persons were armed with rifles and guns. It is alleged that they belong the to Borunda Truck Union which has a business rivalry with the Bilara Truck Union. It is alleged that the incident took place some where between 12 and 12.30 a.m. in the night intervening between 11th and 12th of September, 1988. As soon as, these persons came in two jeeps, they alighted from the jeeps and challenged the persons of the Bilara Truck Union and started firing. It is alleged that one Umaid Singh who was armed with a pistol, fired at Chotha Ram by which he died at the spot and the remaining accused persons fired from their weapons indiscriminately injuring Birbal and Narain Singh and glass panes of the office of the Bilara Truck Union got damaged. It has, therefore, been alleged that these persons cojointly attacked the Union office and, therefore, they are responsible for the entire crime.

2. I have heard Mr. M.C. Bhandari, Mr. M.M. Singhvi, learned Counsel appearing for the accused-petitioners as also Mr. S.S. Byas learned Public Prosecutor and Shri N.K. Bohra learned Counsel for the complainant at length. Actually, the case was argued for three days and detailed arguments were advanced on both the sides. It was contended by Mr. M.C. Bhandari that the FIR which has been lodged by Shri Phaglu Ram is a piece of connection. Actually, it is the accused party which is aggrieved because they have been attacked while proceeding in a convey by the side the of Bilara Truck Union Office. 20 to 22 trucks came from Borunda side and wanted to cross Bilara by the National High-way route but the Bilara Union did not allow them to pass. They were laden with property worth lacs. So there was no occasion for them to pick-up a quarrel with the Union people of the Bilara Truck Union. Actually, it was Bilara Union people who fired at their trucks, damaged their front glasses and tyre of one of the trucks carrying from Gujarat was hit by the fire made by Bilara Union people and got burst and that truck had to lie there for three days. They rushed their trucks from the Chunginaka which is situated near the Bilara Union Office on hearing the sound of whistle blown from the Union Office but inspite of the fact that they speeded up their trucks, the attack was made on their convoy and damage was caused to them. Mr. Bhandari further submitted that actually, it was the Bilara Union people who have fired from their branch office which must have hit Shri Chotha Ram and so as per him, he has been killed because of the fire made by their own people and not by fire alleged to have been made from these trucks which were only trying to pass the Bilara Truck Union Office as early as possible. He has further submitted that the matter did not end there. These trucks were followed and attacked between Kharia Mithapur and Jaitaran and damage was caused to the trucks even there. It is submitted by him that earlier to this occasion also, these Union people did not allow the trucks to pass on the National High Way and several reports have been lodged by the Truck-operators or their drivers from whom ransom was recovered on account of the fact that they wanted to pass by the National highway which passes through Blara town which area was considered to be in the domain of the Bilara Truck Union. It was submitted by him that a wire was sent to the auth








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top