SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Raj) 879

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Navin Chandra Sharma, J.
Jai Prakash - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan - Respondent
S.B. Cr. Revision Petition No. 225 of 1987.
Decided On : 4-11-1987

Compliance with the principle of natural justice, including the issuance of notice and specifying a date for hearing, is necessary in legal proceedings.

Headnote:

Natural Justice - Notice Issuance - Compliance with Principle of Natural Justice

Fact of the Case:

The Chief Judicial Magistrate accepted the final report without issuing a notice to the complainant-petitioner and without specifying a date for hearing, which was necessary for compliance with the principle of natural justice.

Finding of the Court:

The court set aside the order accepting the final report and quashed the notice issued to the petitioner. The petitioner was directed to appear before the Chief Judicial Magistrate to show cause against the acceptance of the final report.

Issues: Non-compliance with the principle of natural justice in the acceptance of the final report by the Chief Judicial Magistrate.

Ratio Decidendi: Compliance with the principle of natural justice, including the issuance of notice and specifying a date for hearing, is necessary in legal proceedings.

Final Decision: The revision was accepted, and the order accepting the final report was set aside. The petitioner was directed to appear before the Chief Judicial Magistrate to show cause against the acceptance of the final report.

JUDGMENT

1. - Heard Mr. Narendra Saraswat and learned public prosecutor. Non-petitioners Nos. 2 to 5 are absent despite service. It is clear from the report of the Chief Judicial Magistrate dated 20th Oct, 1987 sent by him in pursuance of the orders of this Court dated 18th August, 1987 that in the notice stated to have been sent to the petitioner-complainant before acceptance of the final report by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, no specific date was mentioned by him It was necessary for the Chief Judicial Magistrate to issue notice the complainant-petitioner and to serve the same upon him and to hear him on a specified date mentioned in the notice against the acceptance of the final report given by the police. Compliance of this principle of natural justice was not made by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Churu.

2. Consequently, the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate dated June 6, 1987 accepting the final report is set aside and the notice issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Churu to the petitioner as to why the complaint may not be filed against the petitioner under Section 211 Indian Penal Code is also quashed. The petitioner is directed to appear before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Churu on 2nd December, 1987 to show cause against the acceptance of the final report submitted by the police to the Chief Judicial Magistrate on the complaint which had been sent to the police by the Magistrate under Section 156(3) Cr.PC for investigation.Revision Accepted.

*******

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top