SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Raj) 800

J.R.CHOPRA
Udai Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:J.R. Patel, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - The petition is directed against the order of the learned Sessions Judge, Pratapgarh dated 30-5-1988 where by the learned Judge has taken cognizance against the accused-petitioners for the offence under Sections 384 and 347 Indian Penal Code.

2. Facts necesary to be noticed for the disposal of this petition briefly stated are that accused Undailal is a liquor contractor at village Badi in Sub-Division, Nimbaheda, District Chittorgarh. He was having a shop at village. Khara also. On 5-2-1986, a raid was made on his shop in village Khara and the liquor worth Rs. 36,000/- was seized by the Excise Party. The accused-petitioner Udailal and his brother thought this has been because of some information leaked out by complainant Lalchand and his brother Manoharlal. It is alleged that on 5-2-1986, Manoharlal went to village Katadi and from there he was called through one Manmal who is the Munim of accussed Udailal at Nimbaheda. There it is alleged that accused Sushilkumar Manmal and Devendran Kumar were sitting and they accused him of 'Gaddhari', gave beating to him and then he was confined in a room which was closed from out side. Later, it is alleged that on 6-2-1986, complai









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top