SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Raj) 803

B.R.ARORA
Bheem Bahadur – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Bhagwati Prasad, Advocate.
For the Respondent: D.R. Bohra, P.P.

JUDGMENT

1. - This revision petition is directed against the judgment dated October 3, 1990, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nohar, by which the learned Additional Sessions Judge convicted the present petitioner Under Section 228, I.P.C.

2. The petitioner is working as a peon in the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge, Nohar. On October 5, 1990, the learned Additional Sessions Judge was sitting in his Court and was discharging his judicial functions. At that time, the petitioner entered in the Court dragging the sleeper and making noise. When he was asked by the learned Additional Sessions Judge how he was doing like that then the petitioner said that it was his habit and no Presiding Officer has, so far, objected in his doing so. The noise created by dragging the sleepers obstruction in the working of the Presiding Officer. This was done by the petitioner-accused in the presence of Khoob Chand, Mr. Yogi Kumar Advocate, Om Prakash, Mr. Moolchand Advocate, Vishamber Das Reader and Neki Ram, L.D.C., who were present in the Court at that time. The learned Additional Sessions Judge treated this action of the accused-petitioner as obstruction in the discharge of his j













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top