SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Raj) 801

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Shobag Mal Jain, Milap Chandra, JJ.
Balkar Singh And Others - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan - Respondent
D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 411 of 1983.
Decided On : 6-10-1988

Advocates:
For the Accused :M.R. Sharma, Senior Advocate and M.L. Garg, Advocate./G.M. Bhandari, Public Prosecutor.
For the Complainant :S.K. Deedwania, Advocate.

A dying declaration recorded by a Police Officer is admissible in evidence when the deceased is in a critical condition and no person is available in the village to record his dying declaration.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL LAW - Murder - Dying declaration - Admissibility - Dying declaration recorded by a Police Officer - Deceased in a critical condition - No person available in village to record his dying declaration - Admissibility of dying declaration - Section 27, Evidence Act.

Fact of the Case:

The deceased Gurmeet Singh and Gurdeep Singh were shot dead by the accused-appellants Balkar Singh and Sardul Singh. The prosecution case was that the accused-appellants came armed with a pistol and gun along with the co-accused Pragat Singh (who died during trial) from their house through the window opening towards the said land of Ranveer Singh PW 4, the accused Balkar Singh fired shot from his pistol towards the deceased Gurmeet Singh and the accused Sardul Singh fired shot from his gun towards the deceased Gurdeep Singh, all these three witnesses proclaimed as to why they had been shot down and asked not to injure them and, thereafter, they ran away to their house.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the dying declaration recorded by the Police Officer was admissible in evidence as the deceased was in a critical condition and no person was available in the village to record his dying declaration.

Issues: Whether the dying declaration recorded by a Police Officer is admissible in evidence when the deceased is in a critical condition and no person is available in the village to record his dying declaration.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that a dying declaration recorded by a Police Officer is admissible in evidence when the deceased is in a critical condition and no person is available in the village to record his dying declaration. The court relied on the decision in Dilip Singh v. State of Punjab AIR 1979 SC 1973.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeals and revision filed by the State and complainant Harpal Singh PW 1 respectively for awarding capital sentence. The conviction and sentence of the accused appellants Balkar Singh and Sardul Singh under Section 302, Indian Penal Code and Section 27, Arms Act were maintained.

JUDGMENT

1. Cases Referred :Abdul Rahman v. State of Maharashtra AIR 1979 SC 1181,.Balah Ram V. State of U.P. AIR 1974 SC 2165.Dilip Singh v. State of Madras AIR 1979 SC 1173..Dilip Singh v. State of Punjab AIR 1979 SC 1973.Gaurishanker v. State of U.P. [ AIR 1962 Supreme Court 399].Godu v. State of Rajasthan [AIR 1974 SC 2188],.K R. Ramchandra Reddy v. Public Prosecutor [AIR 1976 SC 1994].

JUDGEMENT

2. Milap Chandra, J. - These appeals and revision have been filed against the judgment of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sri Ganganagar dated September 14, 1983, conviction and sentencing the accused-appellants as under:

S. No. Name of the accused appellant Conviction under Section Sentences
1. Balkar Singh 302, IPC Life imprisonment and fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in default, three month's S.I.
27, Arms Act One years R.I and of Rs. 1000/-, in default to undergo 15 day's S.I.
2. Sardulsingh alias Man Singh -do- -do-

2. On August 31, 1982 at 12.05 P.M. Harpal Singh PW 1 lodged FIR Ex. P 1 at the Police Station, Gajsinghpur (Sri Ganganagar) with the allegations, in short, that his uncle Ranveer Singh (PW 4) was allotted a plot measuring 80' x 40' situated at 19-FF by the Sarpanch, Gram Pancbayat, Motasar Kuni at patta (Ex P 9) was issued. The accused Pragat Singh who died during the trial and who was residing in the same Chak used to threaten Ranveer Singh PW 4 that he would not allow him to construct a wall on the said plot, situated adjacent to his house. In the morning of August 31, 1982. the deceased Gurmeet s/o Ranveer Singh and mistry Gurdeep Singh were constructing a wall on the said plot. At about 10.00 A.M., the accused Pargat Singh, Sardul Singh alias Man Singh and Balkar Singh came to the said plot through the window of their house. Accused Pargat Singh was armed with a lathi, Balkar Singh has having a gun and Sardul Singh had a pistol. Pargat Singh asked Balkar Singh and Sardul Singh to do away Gurmeet Singh and Gurdeep Singh. Thereon, both of them filed their pistol and gun and seriously injured Gurmeet Singh and Gurdeep Singh. At the time of the occurrence, Harpal Singh was taking his cattle to the Chhapra. Ranveer Singh PW 4 Mohan Singh, Bheera PW 2 and Daljeet Singh were also present there. The accused persons ran away when they were challenged by them The injured were brought to the Primary Health Centre, Gajsinghpur in a tractor by them. A case under Section 302/34, Indian Penal Code and Section 27, Arms Act was registered and investigation was commenced. Dr. S.C. Agarwal PW 11 attended Gurdeep Singh and Gurmeet Singh. The prosecution case further was that Dr. S.C. Agrawal asked A.S.I. Shri Pana Ram (PW 12) to get the dying declarations of the deceased recorded. A S I Shri Panaram himself recorded the dying declarations Ex. P 28 and Ex. P 29 of Gurdeep Singh and Gurmeet Singh in the presence of the doctor. On his advice, they were removed to the District Hospital, Sri Ganganagar. The Medical Jurist, Dr. Rajendra Kumar Gupta PW 6 examined the injured Gurmeet Singh. The other injured Gurdeep Singh died at 4.40 PM the same day. The dying declaration Ex.P 15 of the injured Gurmeet Singh was recorded by the Judicial Magistrate, Sri Pramod Kumar Vashisth PW 12. He could not record the dying declaration of Gurdeep Singh as he had already died by that time. The injured Gurmeet Singh died at 11.00 AM on September 1, 1982. Dr. Rajendra Kumar Gupta PW 6 conducted the post-mortem examination of their dead bodies and prepared the post-mortem reports Ex. P 17 and Ex. P 19. After completing the investigation, a challan was filed before the Munsif-Judicial Magistrate, Sri Karanpur (Sri Ganganagar) who committed them to the Sessions Judge, Sri Ganganagar. Subsequently, the case was transferred to the Additional Sessions Judge, Sri Ganganagar for trial Charges were framed under Section 302, in the alternative under Section 302 read with Section 34, Indian Penal Code and also Under/Section 27, Arms Act against the accused Balkar Singh an

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top