SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Raj) 628

D.L.MEHTA
Sujan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - Heard learned Counsel for the parties.Under Work Charge Rule 1964, Rule 3 provides that work-charge employee including regular technical staff or Water Works Department for the purpose of this Rule shall be divided into the following three categories:

(i) Permanent status,

(ii) Semi permanent status, and

(iii) Casual.
Those employees who have completed 10 years' service have been given the status of a permanent employee. I fail to understand the difference between the regular employee and the permanent employee. Every permanent employee is a regular employee of the State and he is entitled for the regular grade and all allowances admissible to other employees. This view has been approved by Hon'ble the Supreme Court also. The petitioner is entitled for the regular grade of the post of which he is holding and also allowances of the same grade which are permissible under the Rules to other regular employees from after the completion of 10 years' service. If there is no stigma or default against him. In the instant case the respondents have not come with a case that there is a stigma or default against him.

2. In the result, the writ petition is accepted, the petitioner shall



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top