SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Raj) 900

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
M.B.Sharma, I.S.Israni, JJ.
Ashok Kumar - Appellant
Versus
Village Panchayat - Respondent
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1316 of 1989.
Decided On : 5-11-1989

A Gram Panchayat has no jurisdiction to levy vehicle tax on motor vehicles under Section 64(g) of the Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1953.

Headnote:

TAXATION - VEHICLE TAX - LEVY ON MOTOR VEHICLES - JURISDICTION OF GRAM PANCHAYAT - Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1953, Section 64(g) - Rajasthan Panchayat (General) Rules, 1961, Rules 93(1), 112, 113 - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 2(18) - A Gram Panchayat has no jurisdiction to levy vehicle tax on motor vehicles under Section 64(g) of the Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1953. Such tax can only be levied in accordance with the procedure prescribed under the Rajasthan Panchayat (General) Rules, 1961.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a contractor granted a contract for mining Bajri in a revenue village, challenged the Gram Panchayat's action of charging development tax on the export of Bajri by vehicles. The Panchayat claimed to have imposed vehicle tax under Section 64(g) of the Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1953.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the tax levied by the Gram Panchayat was not a vehicle tax but a tax on the export of Bajri by vehicles. It held that the Panchayat had no jurisdiction to levy such a tax on motor vehicles and that even on other vehicles, it could only be levied in accordance with the procedure prescribed under the Rajasthan Panchayat (General) Rules, 1961.

Issues: Whether the Gram Panchayat had the jurisdiction to levy vehicle tax on motor vehicles under Section 64(g) of the Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1953.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Gram Panchayat had no jurisdiction to levy vehicle tax on motor vehicles under Section 64(g) of the Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1953. It reasoned that the tax levied by the Panchayat was not a vehicle tax but a tax on the export of Bajri by vehicles. It also held that even on other vehicles, it could only be levied in accordance with the procedure prescribed under the Rajasthan Panchayat (General) Rules, 1961.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the resolution imposing the vehicle tax, and declared that no vehicle tax under Section 64(g) of the Act could be levied on motor vehicles.

JUDGMENT

1. - At the request of the learned Counsel for the parties, we proceed to dispose of the writ petition finally though, the case was admitted earlier and the case was posted for orders on the stay application.

2. The petitioner was granted a contract for the period from 1-4-1988 to 31-3-1990, by the Mining Department for Bajri under the Mining Mineral Concession Rules 1986, for the revenue village of Guhala, as is well known Bajri has to be taken from this bed of a river or a Nala as the case may be. After grant of the contract for the aforesaid period, the petitioner who is not a resident of the area which lies in the Gram Panchayat, Guhala, started mining operations and when he used to take Bajri in a truck or a tractor trolley, the non-petitioner, Panchayat started charging the development tax from such of the persons who were exporting Bajri. From the petitioner, the same tax was charged @ L 5/- per trip and receipts like Annexure 1, 2, 3 were issued. The petitioner challenged the aforesaid action of the Panchayat on the ground that the tax which is being levied is without any authority of law. We had admitted the petition and notices were given to the non-petitioner but no reply was filed and only an application under Article 226(3) of the Constitution of India was filed for vacation of stay order. In the aforesaid application all that is stated is that the Gram Panchayat had in fact imposed vehicle tax (Vahan Kar)except on those vehicles which are used for purposes of cultivation in exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (g) of Sub-section (1) of Section 64 of the Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1953, (for short the Act) and the aforesaid tax is said to have been imposed in accordance with law. A Resolution to impose and levy tax was passed by the Gram Panchayat and under it vehicle tax at rate of L 5/- per truck, L 3/- per trolley and Re. 1 per camel cart was to be levied.

3. A look at the aforesaid Anxs. 1 to 3 will show that the printed forms are 'Gram Panchayat, Guhala,' & 'Bajari Niryat Vahano Se Nikas Sulk.' It will clearly appear that it is not a tax on the vehicle but a tax on the export of Bajri by vehicles out side the limits of the Gram Panchayat. A resolution Annexure R/1, dated 25-12-1988 on which reliance has been placed by the learned Counsel for the petitioner will show that resolution No. 4 is in respect of vehicle tax. In order to enable the non-petitioner to meet its expenses incurred amongst other things on supply of water, electricity etc. tax was upheld. It is also mentioned therein that except the vehicles which are used within the limits of Panchayat for cultivation, tax @ L 5/- per truck, L 3/-per trolley and Re. 1/- per camel-cart shall be levied. It is also mentioned that this vehicle tax should also be recovered from such of the persons using for export of Bajri. There is no material on record that in levying the aforesaid tax, the procedure mentioned in Rule 93(1) of the Rajasthan Panchayat (General) Rules, 1961, was followed. That apart even any vehicle tax within the meaning of Section 64(g) of the Act can only be imposed in such a manner as may be prescribed. A look at Rule 112 will show that when a Panchayat has decided to levy tax on vehicles under Clause (g) of Sub-section (1) of Section 64 and the procedure laid down in Rules 93 to 96 has been observed in respect thereon, the Panchayat shall cause to be prepared a register of vehicles liable to such tax, specifying therein the name and address of the owner of each such vehicle and the amount of the tax due in respect thereof Under Sub-rule (2) any person who keeps or plies any vehicle on hire whether he be the owner of such vehicle or a person who possesses it or has the loan of it or has the charge of it in any other capacity shall be deemed to be the person liable to pay the tax on the vehicle which is not a motor vehicle as aforesaid. Motor vehicle is defined in Section 2(18) of the MV Act. Motor vehicle means any mechanically pr




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top