SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Raj) 965

N.K.JAIN
Abdul Gaffar – Appellant
Versus
Narendra Kumar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - This miscellaneous appeal is directed against the order of learned Additional District Judge, No. 1, Jodhpur in Civil misc. case No. 70- B/90 whereby the appellant's application under 0.39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 C.P.C. has been rejected.

2. The main contention of Mr. Bhoot is that the court has acted without jurisdiction in deciding the application without any order passed by executing court under Order 21 Rule 98 Civil Procedure Code. The court should have issued notice under Order 21 Rule 97 to the decree-holder particularly in view of the report of the Sale Amin dated 1.5.90 and thus, the order is liable to be set aside in this misc. appeal.

3. Mr. Y.R. Vyas, Power of attorney holder of the respondent who has appeared in person has submitted that the respondent has obtained a decree for a shop with godown against the petitioner long back and he has obtained a part of the possession of the godown on 2.8.84 in execution of this decree which was passed in the year 1978. He has also submitted that the appellant is a stranger and he has no right to be heard and with the connivance of the judgment-debtor for one reason or the other dragging litigation and dela






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top