SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Raj) 560

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Sobhag Mal Jain, J.
Shankaria - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Jail Appeal No. 433 of 1981.
Decided On : 10-07-1986

Advocates:
For the Petitioner: S.D. Vyas, Amicus Curiae.
For the Respondent: S.K. Mathur, Public Prosecutor.

The credibility of witness testimony and medical evidence is crucial in establishing guilt in assault cases.

Headnote:

Conviction - Assault - The court upheld the conviction of the accused for the offences under Section 326 and 456 IPC based on the evidence of the victim and the doctor's testimony.

Fact of the Case:

The accused was convicted for assaulting the victim with an axe at her house, causing grievous injuries.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the accused guilty based on the victim's testimony and the doctor's evidence of the injuries.

Issues: The issues revolved around the accused's entry into the victim's house and the infliction of injuries with an axe.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the victim's credible testimony and the doctor's evidence to establish the accused's guilt for the assault.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence passed by the Sessions Judge were upheld.

JUDGMENT

1. - This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 25th May, 1981, of the Sessions Judge, Balotra, convicting and sentencing the accused for the offence Under Section 326 IPC to one year's rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 100/-, in default of paymant of fine to two months simple imprisonment and Under Section 456 IPC, six months' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 100/-, in default of payment of fine to one month's simple imprisonment. Both the sentences have been ordered to run concurrently. The accused has already served out the sentence. He was arrested on December 24, 1980 and remained in custody during the trial and even after conviction.

2. The case relates to the incident, which took place on the night intervening 22nd and 23rd December, 1980 at the house of Smt. Chunni.

3. The prosecution story, in brief, was that Smt. Chunni was sleeping in a Jhumpa when the accused came there with an axe in his hand. The shutters were closed from inside but the accused broke open the shutters and entered the Jhumpa. Smt. Chunni ran outside the Jhumpa but the accused chased her and caused a number of injuries on her body by the axe. The injuries of Smt. Chunni were examined by Dr. Gopikishan Vyas, the next day. He found five injuries on her body. All the injuries were caused by a sharp edged weapon. One injury was grievous, while the rest were simple. The doctor opined that the injuries could have been caused by an axe. The First Information Report of the occurrence was lodged at Police Station, Barmer on December 23,1980, at about 10.00 a.m., on which a case Under Section s 458 and 307 was registered against the accused and investigation started.

4. After investigation, the Police filed a charge-sheet against the accused in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Barmer, who committed him for trial to the Court of Sessions Judge, Balotra for the offence Under Section s 307, 459, 326 and 324 IPC. The Sessions Judge tried the accused for the offences Under Section s 307, 458, and 326 IPC. The accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. The prosecution examined as many as 9 witnesses. The accused in his statement Under Section 313 Cr. PC denied the prosecution allegations and stated that he has been falsely implicated.

5. By the judgment dated 25th May, 1981, the Sessions Judge, Balotra, has convicted and sentenced the appellant for the offences Under Section s 326 and 456 IPC as aforesaid. The learned Sessions Judge, however, acquitted him for the offences Under Section s 307 and 458 IPC. The learned Sessions Judge has come to the conclusion that the prosecution has proved that the accused entered the Jhumpa of Smt. Chunni and at that time, he was armed with an axe. Smt. Chunni received a number of injuries by a sharp edged weapon. One of such injuries was grievous in nature. The injuries of Smt. Chunni were caused by the accused. According to the learned Sessions Judge, the offence Under Section s 326 and 456 IPC was duly made out against the accused. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge, the accused-appellant has filed the present appeal in this Court. The appeal was received through jail. As the accused was unrepresented, Shri S.D. Vyas, Advocate, was appointed as Amicus Curiae.

6. I have heard the learned Amicus Curiae and the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge under appeal and the relevant evidence of the prosecution witnesses.

7. The prosecution case rests on the evidence of Smt. Chunni. Smt. Chunni has been examined as PW 8. She herself is an injured. After going through her statement, I do not find any infirmity in her testimony to discredit her. She appears to be a truthful witness. From her evidence, it is amply proved that the accused entered into the Jhumpa of Smt. Chunni armed with an axe. When she went outside the Jhumpa and tried to escape, the accused caused a number of injuries by the axe on h




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top