SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Raj) 736

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Kishore Singh Lodha, Sobhag Mal Jain, JJ.
Sukh Ram - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
D.B. Special Appeal No. 767 of 1986.
Decided On : 15-10-1986

The court emphasized the importance of considering the judgment in the pending application before the allotting authority.

Headnote:

Dispensing with Certified Copy - Application for Consideration of Judgment in Allotment Application - The court dispensed with the production of the certified copy of the judgment under appeal and stated that the judgment should be considered by the allotting authority in the pending application.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant filed an application for dispensing with the production of the certified copy of the judgment under appeal, stating that his son's application was pending consideration before the allotting authority.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the special appeal, with the observation that the allotting authority should consider the judgment and dispose of the application accordingly.

Issues: Application for dispensing with certified copy, consideration of judgment in pending application before allotting authority.

Ratio Decidendi: The judgment under appeal was dispensed with, and the court emphasized that the allotting authority must consider the judgment in the pending application.

Final Decision: The special appeal was dismissed, and the court ordered the allotting authority to consider the judgment and dispose of the application accordingly.

JUDGMENT

1. - An application has been filed by the learned Counsel for the appellant for dispensing with the production of the certified copy of the judgment under appeal. Since that judgment has already been reported in Budha Ram and Anr. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors., AIR 1985 Raj. 104 , the production of the certified copy is dispensed with.

2. We have heard the learned Counsel for the appellants and the learned Addl. Government Advocate.

3. It is stated by the learned Counsel for the appellants that the application of his adult son Dhanna Ram is pending consideration before the allotting authority-cum-Assistant Colonisation Commissioner, Suratgarh. All that he wants is that the application should be considered in the light of the judgment recorded by this Court in D.B. Civil Special Appeal No. 201/84 Om Prakash and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan decided on 28-2-1985 along with connected appeals. There is no doubt that the allotting authority will have to take into consideration this judgment and dispose of that application accordingly.

4. With these observations the special appeal is dismissed.Order accordingly.

*******

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top