RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
J.P.Jain, J.
State of Rajasthan - Appellant
Versus
Laxman Singh and others - Respondent
D.B. Criminal appeal No. 303 of 1973.
Decided On : 8-01-1974
CRIMINAL LAW - SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION - OFFENCE OF CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY - OBJECT OF CONSPIRACY - COGNIZABLE AND NON-COGNIZABLE OFFENCES - SECTION 196A, CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE.
Fact of the Case:
The three respondents were charged with various offences, including criminal conspiracy, cheating, forgery, and falsification of records. The Special Judge quashed the proceedings against them on the ground that sanction was not obtained Under Section 196A, Criminal Procedure Code.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that the offence of criminal conspiracy punishable Under Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code is a cognizable offence if the object of the conspiracy is to commit a cognizable offence punishable with more than two years' imprisonment. The Court further held that the offences Under Sections 420 and 165A, Indian Penal Code are cognizable offences and they are punishable for more than two year's imprisonment of either description.
Issues: 1. Whether the offence of criminal conspiracy punishable Under Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code is a cognizable offence if the object of the conspiracy is to commit a cognizable offence punishable with more than two years' imprisonment? 2. Whether the offences Under Sections 420 and 165A, Indian Penal Code are cognizable offences and they are punishable for more than two year's imprisonment of either description?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Court held that the offence of criminal conspiracy punishable Under Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code is a cognizable offence if the object of the conspiracy is to commit a cognizable offence punishable with more than two years' imprisonment. The Court relied on the definition of cognizable offence in Section 4(g) of the Criminal Procedure Code and the Schedule II appended to the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. The Court held that the offences Under Sections 420 and 165A, Indian Penal Code are cognizable offences and they are punishable for more than two year's imprisonment of either description. The Court relied on the definition of cognizable offence in Section 4(g) of the Criminal Procedure Code and the Schedule II appended to the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Final Decision: The Court allowed the appeal and set aside the judgment of the Special Judge. The case was remanded back to the Special Judge for Rajasthan Jaipur City, who was directed to proceed with the case according to law.
I.S.N. Modi, Special Judge, Jaipur City, do hereby charge you, Laxman Singh son of Shri Man Singh r/o Lalkothi, Jaipur as follows:
1. That you, the then Dy. S.P. Wireless Deptt, while acting as Superintendent of Police, Wireless Deptt Jaipur, were a party to a criminal conspiracy with Shri Mahesh Chandra Sharma, I/C-Store, Wireless Deptt Jatpur and Ram Prakash s/o Shyam Sander Agarwal, Proprietor of M/S Radionics, Jaipur as having agreed to do illegal act for obtaining illegal pecuniary advantage for you all to the tune of Rs. 3.900/- by illegal and corrupt means in between the period 14-6-63 to 26-10-63 and the mode adopted by you all was to accept false bills without quotations, prepare false bills and records and verify such bills with regard to conversion at 60 B.C. 375 E Transmitter sees from 24-28 volts to 12 volts with an ulterior motive to cheat the Government of Rajasthan and there by to obtain illegal pecuniary advantage for you ail. You have thereby committed an offence punishable Under Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code.
2. That in pursuance of the aforesaid conspiracy, you alongwith Mahesh Chandra Sharma and Mr. Ram Prakash in between the aforesaid period, by illegal or corrupt means, obtained illegal advantage of Rs. 3,900/- by preparing or having got prepared false bills and A.C. bills, by accepting bogus bills and by falsifying or having got falsified the records of the Wireless Department, Jaipur with regard to the conversion of 60 B. C. 375 E Transmitter sets which were not in existence unconverted at that time in the Wireless Department. You have thereby committed an offence punishable Under Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Consumption Act read with Section 120B, Indian Penal Code.
3. That in pursuance of the aforesaid conspiracy you also cheated the Government to the tune of Rs. 3,900/- as aforesaid by falsely withdrawing the conversion charges for 60 Transmitter sets which as such were not in stock of the Wireless Department and thereby fraudulently obtained illegal advantage. You have thereby committed an offence Under Section 420 read with Section 120B, Indian Penal Code.
4. That you in pursuance of the aforesaid criminal conspiracy, forged documents or got the same forged belonging to the Wireless Department by splitting the bills and manipulating the records intending that they shall be used for the purpose of cheating with an ulterior motive of obtaining illegal pecuniary advantage for you all and thereby committed an offence punishable Under Section 468 read with Section 120B, Indian Penal Code.
5. That you in pursuance of the aforesaid criminal conspiracy fraudulently or dishonestly managed to obtain false bills for conversion of 60 C.B. 375E Transmitter sets from Shri Ram Prakaih and used them as genuine which you knew or had reason to believe at time yo
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.