SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Raj) 486

V.S.DAVE
Shyam Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Jagdeep Dhankar, Advocate.
For the Respondent:B.P. Gupta, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - The petitioner has challenged the order passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Deeg, dated 27-4-1985, whereby he set aside the order by Judicial Magistrate, Bayana dated 30-1-1985, directing the custody of vehicle No. RSD 3681 to Shyam Singh and now ordered by revisional court to be delivered to Prem Chand.

2. The aforesaid vehicle was seized by police in relation to the investigation of criminal case No. 12/85 registered at Police Station Bayana on 16-1-1985, on a report lodged by petitioner, Shyam Singh, where in he gave details about the disputes in respect of the vehicle and also bringing out a case of cheating. An application under Section 457 Cr. PC was filed which, as mentioned above, was decided in favour of the petitioner. The revisional court reversed this order on the ground that Prem Chand is the registered owner of the vehicle and the final report has also been submitted by the police.

3. The grievance of petitioner in this case is that the revision petition was not maintainable before the Additional Session Judge; and further that he could not directly exercise the powers under Section 452 Cr. PC and further that there is a factual error in the judgment that







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top