SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Raj) 526

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Kanta Bhatnagar, Jas Raj Chopra, JJ.
Bhanwar Lal - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
D.B. Criminal (Jail) Appeal No. 60 of 1980.
Decided On : 18-07-1985

The importance of carefully scrutinizing the evidence of a solitary witness in criminal cases.

Headnote:

Section 302 IPC - Murder - [302 IPC] - The court found the appellant guilty of murdering his wife based on the testimony of a single witness, despite lack of support from other witnesses. The court emphasized the importance of carefully scrutinizing the evidence of a solitary witness and concluded that the conviction was justified based on the testimony of the witness.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant was convicted for the murder of his wife based on the testimony of a single witness, despite lack of support from other witnesses.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the appellant guilty of the murder based on the testimony of the solitary witness, emphasizing the importance of carefully scrutinizing the evidence of a single witness.

Issues: The main issue was the reliance on the testimony of a single witness in convicting the appellant for murder.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the principle of carefully scrutinizing the evidence of a solitary witness and concluded that the conviction was justified based on the testimony of the witness.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction of the appellant for murder was upheld.

JUDGMENT

1. - Appellant Bhanwarlal was tried for the offence under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife Smt. Dhapi, by the Sessions Judge, Jodhpur. By the judgment dated January 30, 1980, the learned Sessions Judge convicted the appellant for the aforesaid offence and sentenced him to imprisonment for life.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case giving rise to this appeal are that Bhanwarlal and his wife Smt. Dhapi were very often quarrelling because of the former not earning anything and extracting money from the latter. The appellant is said to be addicted to the intoxication and gambling. On July 24, 1979 on hearing the shrieks of Smt. Dhapi, Smt. Badami (PW 1) and Smt. Champa (PW 7) rushed to her house. They saw the accused inflicting blows with scissors to Smt. Dhapi in the kitchen. They raised the cry. On hearing the cries of those two ladies, Ramdayal (PW 8) also went to the house of the appellant. He saw the appellant causing injuries with scissors to his wife Smt. Dhapi. Ramdayal enquired of the appellants to what he was doing, Even after his asking so, the appellant went on causing scissors injuries to his wife. On sustaining an injury on the neck, Smt. Dhapi fell down. The appellant ran away from there leaving behind the scissors in the kitchen. Ramdayal immediately went to the Police Station Pipar city and lodged the written report before PW 11 Shankerlal SHO. The SHO registered the case under Section 302 IPC against the appellant and chalked out the formal FIR Ex. P/14. The SHO then went to the house of Bhanwarlal. He found the dead body of Smt. Dhapi lying there. He prepared the site plan Ex. P/5 and site inspection memo Ex. P/15. The SHO took in possession the scissors Ex. 7 and sealed it. He collected blood from the site in the bottle and sealed it. The inquest memo Ex. P/7 was prepared. The SHO sent for Dr. P.S. Bhandari (PW 10), Medical Officer, Incharge SHO., Pipar city, District Jodhpur. Dr. Bhandari conducted the autopsy over the dead body of Smt. Dhapi on July 24, 1979 at Piparcity at the residence of the deceased. The Doctor noted following injuries on the dead body:

(1) 11/2 "x 1/2" on left side chest 1" below middle of left clavical, penetrating to the thoracic cavity

(2) 1/2" x 1/2" on left side up or half of neck just near to angle of mandible on left side, penetrating and injuring to superficial and deep vessels

(3) 1" x ⅓" x ⅓" on 1" front of left ear on left side face

(4) 1/4" x ⅓" on left side face near angle of mandible

(5) 1/2" x ⅓" transverse on front of lower half of neck just on left side, penetrating into traches

(6) Abrasions : Four abrasions of size 1/2" x 1/4" x 1/2" x ⅓", ⅓" x ⅓" and 1/2" x 172" on left side of face from left side of chin to check on left side.

3. The post-mortem examination report Ex. P/12 was prepared. On July 24, 1979 at about 2.00 P.M. the SHO arrested appellant Bhanwarlal. The appellant was wearing shirt Ex. 1 and Dhoti Ex. 2 at the time. Those clothes being suspected of having blood stains were taken in possession by the SHO and sealed. The articles recovered during the course of investigation were sent for chemical examination. The report of the Chemical Examiner is Ex. P/11 and that of the Serologist is Ex. P/12.

4. Upon completing the necessary investigation chargesheet against the appellant was filed in the Court of Munsif and Judicial Magistrate Bilara. The learned Magistrate finding it to be a case exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions, committed the appellant to the Court of Sessions Judge, Jodhpur to stand his trial there. The learned Sessions Judge chargesheeted the appellant for the offence under Section 302 IPC and recorded his plea. He denied the allegations and claimed to be tried. The prosecution examined 11 witnesses. Relying on the prosecution evidence, the learned Sessions Judge convicted and sentenced the appellant as stated earlier.

5. Feeling aggrieved by the conviction and sentence, the appellant has preferred this appeal in this Court thr












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top