SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Raj) 614

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
Jagdish Sharan Verma, J.
Smt. Bhonri & Ors. - Appellant
Versus
Kailash Chand & Ors. - Respondent
S.B. Civil Revision No. 262 of 1982.
Decided On : 4-05-1987

The court emphasized the importance of allowing amendments to the plaint when they arise out of the initial pleadings and effectively determine the controversy between the parties.

Headnote:

Amendment of Plaint - Plaintiff's Application - The court allowed the plaintiff's application for amendment of the plaint to seek another relief of possession on the same property in respect of which the relief of permanent injunction was initially claimed.

Fact of the Case:

The plaintiff filed a suit for a permanent injunction and subsequently applied for an amendment of the plaint to seek another relief of possession on the same property. The trial Court rejected the plaintiff's application for amendment of the plaint.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the trial Court erroneously held that the amendment would change the nature of the suit and concluded that there was no reason to refuse such an amendment, as it arose out of the initial pleadings and would effectively determine the controversy between the parties.

Issues: The main issue was the refusal of the trial Court to allow the plaintiff's application for amendment of the plaint.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the amendment in the plaint could not have been refused, particularly when it arose out of the initial pleadings and would effectively determine the controversy between the parties.

Final Decision: The court allowed the plaintiff's application for amendment of the plaint and set aside the trial Court's order. The revision was allowed with no order as to costs.

JUDGMENT

1. - This is a plaintiff's appl. against the trial Court's order dated 5-2-1982 rejecting the plaintiff's application dated 9-3 1981 for amendment of the plaint. The suit was filed initially for the main relief of a permanent injunction. Subsequently the petitioner has applied for amendment of the plaint to seek another relief of possession on the same property in respect of which the relief of permanent injunction was claimed, initially. There is no reason why such an amendment in the plaint could have been refused particularly when it arose out of tie initial pleadings and would undoubtedly effectively determine the controversy between the parlies. The trial Court has erroneously held that such an amendment would change the nature of the suit. The order cannot, therefore, be sustained.

2. Consequently, the revision is allowed. The impugned order dated 5-2-1982 of the trial Court is set aside and the plaintiff's application dated 9-3-1981 is allowed.

3. No order as to costs.Revision allowed.

*******

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top