SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Raj) 299

G.M.LODHA
Champa Lal S/O Sh. Shriram – Appellant
Versus
State Transport Appellate – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - Petitioner, Champalal, has filed this writ petition, claiming, himself to be a bus vehicle opertator and has made the following prayer:

"It is, therefore, humbly prayed that the writ petition may kindly be accepted and a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other writs, order or direction which may be deemed proper in the circumstances of the case be kindly issued, setting aside and quashing the order of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur dated 5-3-79 to the extent of making direction to the R.T.A. that the period of 4 months allowed to the petitioner for engaging a higher model vehicle should not be extended, and order dated 3-7-79 passed by Secretery R.T.A, Bikaner."

2. The Order of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Rajasthan, Jaipur, (hereinafter called to as 'the Tribunal'), dated the 5th March, 1979, contains the following important directions:

"When the appellant does not have a ready vehicle even today and the respondents had already obtained permits on the vehicles which were offered by them then the subsequent fact that the respondent No. 3 has taken permission to sell the vehicle and replace it with a higher model will not lower his positio
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top