SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Raj) 240

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
B.P.Beri, L.S.Mehta, JJ.
Shanker Pandit - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan - Respondent
D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 189 of 1968.
Decided On : 16-10-1970

Advocates:
For the Appellant:D. Parihar, Advocate.
For the State:H.N. Calla, Advocate.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of medical evidence and the admissibility of extra-judicial confessions in determining the guilt of the accused.

Headnote:

Strangulation - Murder - Section 302, IPC - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, which deals with punishment for murder. The court also referred to the principles of medical jurisprudence and the legal principles related to extra-judicial confessions. The interpretation of the medical evidence and the admissibility of the extra-judicial confession influenced the court's decision.

Fact of the Case:

The accused was convicted for murdering his wife by strangulation. The prosecution presented evidence including medical examination and extra-judicial confessions. The accused appealed against the judgment, disputing the reliability of the medical evidence and the admissibility of the confessions.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the medical evidence supported death by strangulation and upheld the credibility of the extra-judicial confessions. The court also considered the provocation experienced by the accused and altered the conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304, Part I, IPC, reducing the sentence to seven years' rigorous imprisonment.

Issues: The issues included the reliability of medical evidence, admissibility of extra-judicial confessions, and the applicability of provocation as a defense.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the interpretation of medical evidence and the principles of extra-judicial confessions to determine the guilt of the accused. The court also considered the provocation experienced by the accused in altering the conviction and sentencing.

Final Decision: The court partially allowed the appeal, altering the conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder and reducing the sentence to seven years' rigorous imprisonment.

JUDGMENT

1. - Accused Shanker Pandit has been convicted under Section 302, I.P.C, for murdering his wife Mst. Ram Bai, aged 16 years, and sentenced to imprisonment for life by the learned Sessions Judge, Jaipur City, on February 27, 1968. The accused appeals against that judgment to this Court.

2. The material facts of the case, as alleged by the prosecution, are that the accused Shanker Pandit worked as ayce in 61, Cavalry, C squadron, Jaipur. He was residing in quarter No. 9, located in the family lines of the above Cavalry. As a groom, it was his duty to take care of the Cavalry horses and to keep ready a horse for the use of his officer Dafedar Abdul Gafoor P.W. 4. In the morning of September 19, 1967, the said Dafedar went to the stable where he did not find his horse ready to take for a ride. On his inquiry, Shanker Pandit candidly told him that he had killed his wife as he had suspected that she had been in liason with some other person. Abdul Gafoor, having been so informed, apprised Dafedar Major Faiz Mohammed Khan PW 8 of what he had been told. Shanker Pandit was called by Faiz Mohammed Khan. On his query he too was told by the groom that he had murdered his wife. Then reported the matter to Rasaldar Fateh Mohammed Khan. Faiz Mohammed Khan as also to Captain R.S. Sodhi (PW 8). These two officers also made separate inquires from the accused and he reiterated before them the facts as to how he had killed his wife. Dr. J.P. Mathur, P.W. 2, Regimental Medical Officer, 61, Cavalry, Jaipur, was called by Mr. Sodhi for the examination of Mst. Ram Bai. Dr. Mathur found the woman dead as a result of the ottling. The accused was then put into the custody of the quarter-guard. The police station, Sadar, Jaipur, was informed by the military authorities, P.W. 9 Ramchander, station officer of the said police station, registered a case against Shanker Pandit under Section 302, IPC , and started investigation The dead body of Mst. Ram Bai was sent to Dr. S.N. Dugar, P.W. 3, Medical Jurist, S.M.B. Hospital, Jaipur. He conducted the post mortem examination of the corpse on September 19, 1967, 4. 45 p.m. He found the following injuries on the person of the deceased:

1. On the face two abradded acchymosis on the lower part of the left check placed parallel to each other. Both the above injuries were place 1.3" and 1 7" from the middle of the chin. The size of each of the said injuries was " X 1/10".

2. Four patches of abradded acchymosis in an area of 1" X 7/10" on the front of neck slightly left to the medial line. The biggest patch was triangular shaped ⅓" X ⅓" in size.

3. There were multiple abrasions in an area of 1.2" X " on the right lateral side of the neck, 3" below the lower part of the right ear. The said injury was consistent with nail and finger marks.

4. There was a small abrasion " X ⅙" one inch above the injury No. 3.
In the opinion of the Doctor, the cause of death was possibility manual strangulation. The effect of the injuries could have caused death. After necessary investigation the police put up a challan against the accused Shanker Pandit in the court of the Additional Munsiff-Magisarste (West), Jaipur City. The said Magistrate conducted preliminary inquiry in accordance with the provisions of Section 207-A., Cr P C, and committed the accused to the Court of the Sessions Judge, Jaipur City, to face trial under Section 302, I P.C On December 13, 1967, the accused was charged by the trial court for the offence of murdering his wife Mst. Ram Bai, to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. The prosecution examined nine witnesses. In his statement recorded under Section 342, Cr. P.C, the accused stated that his wife had fallen ill on the previous day of her death. She could not sleep in the night and in the morning when he got up, he found her fast asleep. Abdul Gafoor came to him and he was told that his wife had fallen ill. He saw his wife. When he found her in a precarious condition, he suggested to him to confess h



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top