1970 Supreme(Raj) 240
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
B.P.Beri, L.S.Mehta, JJ.
Shanker Pandit - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan - Respondent
D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 189 of 1968.
Decided On : 16-10-1970
For the Appellant:D. Parihar, Advocate.
For the State:H.N. Calla, Advocate.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of medical evidence and the admissibility of extra-judicial confessions in determining the guilt of the accused.
Headnote:
Strangulation - Murder - Section 302, IPC - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, which deals with punishment for murder. The court also referred to the principles of medical jurisprudence and the legal principles related to extra-judicial confessions. The interpretation of the medical evidence and the admissibility of the extra-judicial confession influenced the court's decision.
Fact of the Case:
The accused was convicted for murdering his wife by strangulation. The prosecution presented evidence including medical examination and extra-judicial confessions. The accused appealed against the judgment, disputing the reliability of the medical evidence and the admissibility of the confessions.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the medical evidence supported death by strangulation and upheld the credibility of the extra-judicial confessions. The court also considered the provocation experienced by the accused and altered the conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304, Part I, IPC, reducing the sentence to seven years' rigorous imprisonment.
Issues: The issues included the reliability of medical evidence, admissibility of extra-judicial confessions, and the applicability of provocation as a defense.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the interpretation of medical evidence and the principles of extra-judicial confessions to determine the guilt of the accused. The court also considered the provocation experienced by the accused in altering the conviction and sentencing.
Final Decision: The court partially allowed the appeal, altering the conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder and reducing the sentence to seven years' rigorous imprisonment.
1. On the face two abradded acchymosis on the lower part of the left check placed parallel to each other. Both the above injuries were place 1.3" and 1 7" from the middle of the chin. The size of each of the said injuries was " X 1/10".
2. Four patches of abradded acchymosis in an area of 1" X 7/10" on the front of neck slightly left to the medial line. The biggest patch was triangular shaped ⅓" X ⅓" in size.
3. There were multiple abrasions in an area of 1.2" X " on the right lateral side of the neck, 3" below the lower part of the right ear. The said injury was consistent with nail and finger marks.
4. There was a small abrasion " X ⅙" one inch above the injury No. 3.
In the opinion of the Doctor, the cause of death was possibility manual strangulation. The effect of the injuries could have caused death. After necessary investigation the police put up a challan against the accused Shanker Pandit in the court of the Additional Munsiff-Magisarste (West), Jaipur City. The said Magistrate conducted preliminary inquiry in accordance with the provisions of Section 207-A., Cr P C, and committed the accused to the Court of the Sessions Judge, Jaipur City, to face trial under Section 302, I P.C On December 13, 1967, the accused was charged by the trial court for the offence of murdering his wife Mst. Ram Bai, to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. The prosecution examined nine witnesses. In his statement recorded under Section 342, Cr. P.C, the accused stated that his wife had fallen ill on the previous day of her death. She could not sleep in the night and in the morning when he got up, he found her fast asleep. Abdul Gafoor came to him and he was told that his wife had fallen ill. He saw his wife. When he found her in a precarious condition, he suggested to him to confess h