SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Raj) 808

B.R.ARORA
Anju Behal – Appellant
Versus
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants:Mr. D.K. Parihar and Mr. D.D. Calla, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. P.K. Bhansali, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - These two appeals are directed against the award dated December 7, 1988, passed by the Judge, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Sri Ganganagar, in Claim Case No. 21 of 1985 ( Anju Behal v. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation) and Claim Case No. 100 of 1985 ( Ramesh Rani v. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation ), by which the learned Judge of the Tribunal allowed the claim petitions in part and awarded the compensation to the tune of Rs. 3,89,000/ - and apportioned the compensation so awarded amongst the various claimants and the dependants.

2. Dr. Vinod Kumar Behal, who was working as the Incharge, Primary Health Centre, Dalimir Khera, District Firozpur (Punjab), had come to Sri Ganganagar on December 1, 1984. He along with Bhagat Ram Nagpal, on Luna moped, was going to village Nathawala side on Ganganagar - Hanumangarh State Highway on the left side of the road and when their Luna reached near the rubber factory, a bus No. RSG 6222 came from behind and dashed against the Luna, due to which Bhagat Ram Nagpal and Dr. Vinod Kumar Behal fell down and bus, after crushing them, collided with an electric pole and, thereafter, went in a ditch and stopped there. T












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top