SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Raj) 584

M.C.JAIN
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Rangji – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - These miscellaneous appeals have been filed under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') against the common order of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Banswara dated January 4, 1989 granting R.s. 15,000/- in each case under Section 92-A of the Act. The facts of the cases may be summarised thus.

2. Respondent-claimants filed petitions under Section 110-B of the Act against Man-singh driver (respondent No. 3), Poonam Chand owner (respondent No. 4) and the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. (appellant) with the allegations, in short, that the bus No. RSH 1685, owned by Poonam Chand, was being driven by Mansingh driver on April 10, 1988 in Khargoti valley. It was insured with the appellant company. It met with an accident at 3 p.m. on that day. It was being driven rashly and negligently by its driver Mansingh. Shankar, Panchu, Daludi, Mavji, Ramesh, Jeevli and Prabhu were sitting in it and they died. In each case, application under Section 92-A of the Act was moved. After hearing the parties, the learned Tribunal awarded 15,000/- in each case by its common order dated January 4, 1989 which has been challenged in these miscellaneous app






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top