SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Raj) 612

G.M.LODHA
Hassa Mal – Appellant
Versus
Jatti Ram – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - In this appeal the Tribunal has allowed compensation of #2352; 10,000/- to the parents of the deceased, who died by accident at the age of 9 years.

2. Mr. Mathur has relied upon the following decisions in support of his claim for increase of compensation from #2352; 10,000 to #2352; 50,000/-.

(1) Mangaldas Mohanhl Patel and Anr. v. Union of India 1982 ACJ 426 ,

(2) New India Assurance Co. and Anr. v. Ram Dayal and Ors., 1986 ACJ 464 (Rajasthan)

(3) Ramloton and Anr. v. Bhagwati Prasad and Ors., (1984) 1 ACC 391 ,

(4) Tehmina Jasawalla v. Mahadeo Sitaram Chadi and Ors., 1983 ACJ 666 ,

(5) Rashid Husain and Anr. v. Union of India, 1984 ACJ 635 .

3. Mr. Bhargava submits that the claim of the appellants cannot be accepted. He placed reliance upon the following decisions:

(6) Nachhan and Anr. v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., 1985 ACJ 37 .

(7) Lakshmamma and Ors. v. C. Das and Ors., 1985 ACJ 199 .

(8) Smt. Shivkor Motasing v. Ramanaresh Munsisingh, 1978 ACJ 334 .

(9) Jupiter Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. and Ors. v. Balkishan, 1985 ACJ 77 .

4. I have given a thoughtful consideration to the rival contentions of learned Counsel for the parties and have also considered the prin









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top