SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Raj) 363

S.K.M.LODHA
Karpal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sardar Lakh Singh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - This is a defendant's revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the order dated July 25, 1980 of the District Judge, Bhilwara passed in Civil Original Suit No. 6 of 1980.

2. A few facts leading to this revision may be noted, The plaintiff non-petitioner instituted a suit for Rs. 14,980/- on the basis of two pro-notes, which are said to have been executed by the defendant-petitioner. The suit appears to have been filed under Order 37, Rule 2, C.P.C. The summons dated January 28, 1980 was issued and served on the defendant-petitioner on January 29, 1980. On the to of the summons TARIKH PESHI mentioned was March 7, 1980. The defendant went to engage a counsel for appearing in court for March 7, 1980. After seeing the summons, the counsel told him that he should have appeared with in 10 days of the service of the summons. The defendant appeared in Court on March 7, 1980, and submitted an application under Order 37, Rule 3(7), C.P.C. stating the cause for not appearing within 10 days from the date of service of the summons and prayed for excusing the delay caused in entering appearance in Court. The reason that was mentioned in the application was














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top